Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;25:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104012

Specifications Table

Subject area Materials Science
More specific subject area Polymers and Plastics
Type of data Figure, Table and image (microscopy)
How data was acquired Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (SEM JEOL 6300 and JEOL-JSM-6500 F).
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Nanosurf easyscan 2 AFM/STM).
Data format Raw and analyzed
Experimental factors The samples were dried at 40 °C for 24 h and then coated with an Au–Pd thin film. For SEM, samples were sputter coated with Au–Pd for 30 s on a Quorum Q150T ES sputter coater system.
Experimental features Virgin or recycled PET/PLA, Virgin or recycled PET/Chitosan filaments were analyzed by their morphological and topographical features.
Data source location Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada (CICATA) IPN Unidad Altamira, Tamaulipas, México.
CSIC-Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas (CENIM), Madrid, Spain.
Data accessibility Data are with the article.
Related research article A.M. Torres-Huerta, D. Palma-Ramírez, M.A. Domínguez-Crespo, D. Del Angel-López, D. de la Fuente. Comparative assessment of miscibility and degradability on PET/PLA and PET/chitosan blends,
European Polymer Journal 61 (2014) 285–299[1].