Table 1.
Comparison of 2-dimensional spatial distributions of aggregate structures in observed and theoretical populations1
| Population examined6 | Number of structures | Number of squares | Average number of structures/ grid square2 | Number of grid squares containing structures | |||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 35 | ||||
| 97–863 expected4 |
154 | 103 | 1.50 1.50 |
15 23.1 |
40 34.5 |
38 25.8 |
10 12.9 |
| 97–142 expected |
115 | 104 | 1.11 1.11 |
19 35.1 |
57 38.5 |
26 21.1 |
2 7.7 |
| 916–150 expected |
94 | 106 | 0.89 0.89 |
32 43.7 |
56 38.7 |
16 17.2 |
2 5.1 |
| 916–444 expected |
74 | 106 | 0.70 0.70 |
45 52.7 |
49 36.8 |
11 12.9 |
1 3.0 |
| 920–125 expected |
106 | 106 | 1.00 1.00 |
27 39.0 |
54 39.0 |
23 19.5 |
2 6.5 |
| 920–400 expected |
94 | 106 | 0.89 0.89 |
36 43.7 |
47 38.7 |
22 17.2 |
1 5.1 |
1. The populations shown in Figure 6 were used to obtain the observed values. 2. The grid square area within which structures were counted was 30.25 mm2. 3. Two time points (frames) were measured from each sequence: 86 & 142, 150 & 144, 125 & 400. 4. Expected values are Poisson distributions of theoretical populations with the same average number of structures per grid square. 5. Squares containing 4 (1), 5 (2) and 6 (1) are included for population 97–86. 6. Chi-square and p values were obtained by comparison of the observed and theoretical populations divided into 4 classes. Thus there are 3 degrees of freedom for all populations. The values obtained are: 97–86: 10.1, p = .017; 97–142: 21.6, p = .0001; 916–150: 12.8, p = .0048; 916–444: 6.8, p = .086; 920–125: 13.2, p = .0041; 920–400: 7.8, p = .052.