Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;14:1177271919851515. doi: 10.1177/1177271919851515

Table 3.

Ratio of strong positive pixels (strong staining) on total pixels and weak positive pixels (weak staining) on total pixels for GFAP for the 6 different regions of interest and for all regions.

GFAP
Sham
TBI
HH
TBI+HH
Strong staining (%) Weak staining (%) Strong staining (%) Weak staining (%) Strong staining (%) Weak staining (%) Strong staining (%) Weak staining (%)
Neocortex 36.9 ± 2.1 16.4 ± 3.1 24.3 ± 1.1* 28.7 ± 2.3 17 ± 0.7*§ 32.9 ± 1.6* 17.1 ± 1*§ 32.4 ± 2.1*
Striatum 28.4 ± 1.8 19.7 ± 3.1 18.5 ± 2.3* 35.1 ± 3.5* 17.7 ± 1.2* 34.5 ± 2.2* 20.4 ± 1.8* 31.4 ± 3*
Thalamus 27.7 ± 1.3 19.9 ± 3.2 20.1 ± 1.5 25.4 ± 3.1 20.9 ± 1.6 27.1 ± 2.3 20.8 ± 1.8 25.3 ± 2.6
Dentate gyrus 38.7 ± 3.4 10.6 ± 2.4 29 ± 2 18.1 ± 2.4 30.8 ± 2.1 18.1 ± 2.3 29.4 ± 3.6 21.2 ± 3.6
CA-1 region 35.7 ± 3.1 12.3 ± 2.3 29.7 ± 2.3 16.4 ± 2.4 28.8 ± 2.1 18.4 ± 2.5 29.7 ± 3.1 17.9 ± 3.3
Corpus callosum 37.2 ± 4.9 11 ± 3 33 ± 4.7 17.6 ± 3.6 27.7 ± 1.6 17.1 ± 2.1 28.8 ± 1.6 14.9 ± 1.9
All regions 34 ± 1.3 15.1 ± 1.3 25.5 ± 1.2* 23.8 ± 1.5* 21.8 ± 0.7*§ 27.1 ± 1.1* 22.5 ± 0.9* 26 ± 1.3*

Abbreviations: GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; HH, hypoxia-hypotension; SEM, standard error of the mean; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Ratios are expressed in percentage of total pixels. Data are expressed in mean ± SEM.

*

P < .05 vs Sham group. §P < .05 vs TBI group.