Table 5.

Tabular presentation for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool results. Table format adapted from Whiting et al [22].

Study	Risk of bias				Applicability concerns
	Patient selection	Index test	Reference standard	Flow and timing	Patient selection	Index test	Reference standard
Al-Shobaili et al [24]	Low risk	Unclear risk	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Barrado et al [28]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Burton et al [30]	High risk	Unclear risk	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Gitman et al [31]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Granato et al [32]	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Hobbs et al [33]	High risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Lang et al [34]	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Lee et al [35]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Liermann et al [36]	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Liu et al [37]	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Loughman et al [25]	High risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Binnicker et al [29]	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Miller et al [38]	High risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Parra-Sánchez et al [39]	High risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Patel et al [26]	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Van Der Pol et al [40]	Low risk	Unclear risk	Unclear risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Shevlin and Morrow [41]	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Shoji et al [27]	High risk	High risk	Unclear risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk
Tong et al [42]	Unclear risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk