Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;7(2):e12704. doi: 10.2196/12704

Table 1.

Performance of three word embedding methods with different embedding sizes. Italicized values indicate the best performance of the date set.

Corpus and tuning state GloVea Word2Vec FastText
100b 200 400 100 200 400 100 200 400
Tianya

Before 0.266 0.263 0.282 0.289 0.296 0.272 0.341 0.340 0.319

After 0.313 0.308 0.320 0.325 0.338 0.341 0.355 0.362 0.371
Haodf

Before 0.270 0.273 0.289 0.288 0.290 0.295 0.320 0.322 0.331

After 0.321 0.326 0.332 0.313 0.344 0.346 0.361 0.365 0.385

aGloVe: Global Vectors.

bValues in this row indicate embedding size.