Table 1.
Performance of three word embedding methods with different embedding sizes. Italicized values indicate the best performance of the date set.
| Corpus and tuning state | GloVea | Word2Vec | FastText | |||||||
| 100b | 200 | 400 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ||
| Tianya | ||||||||||
|
|
Before | 0.266 | 0.263 | 0.282 | 0.289 | 0.296 | 0.272 | 0.341 | 0.340 | 0.319 |
|
|
After | 0.313 | 0.308 | 0.320 | 0.325 | 0.338 | 0.341 | 0.355 | 0.362 | 0.371 |
| Haodf | ||||||||||
|
|
Before | 0.270 | 0.273 | 0.289 | 0.288 | 0.290 | 0.295 | 0.320 | 0.322 | 0.331 |
|
|
After | 0.321 | 0.326 | 0.332 | 0.313 | 0.344 | 0.346 | 0.361 | 0.365 | 0.385 |
aGloVe: Global Vectors.
bValues in this row indicate embedding size.