Table 1. Colistin AST methods compared in this study.
VITEK 2 cards were incubated and evaluated automatically by the device, all other tests were incubated at 36 ± 2°C for 16–20 hours in ambient air. McF, McFarland standard; CAMHB, cation-adjusted Muller-Hinton II broth; QC, quality control; MHA, Muller-Hinton agar; BMD, broth microdilution; FSCA, Field Safety Corrective Action.
Test | Description | MIC range (mg / L) |
Inoculum | Medium used in this study | Comment | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Broth microdilution | In-house prepared serial dilution of colistin sulfate in untreated polystyrene 96-well plates | ≤0.25 –>128 | 5 × 105 CFU / mL | CAMHB (Sigma-Aldrich) |
EUCAST and CLSI reference method; comparably labor intensive; single isolate test runs possible; |
ISO 20776–1[15] |
Agar dilution | In-house prepared serial dilution of colistin sulfate in untreated polystyrene 96-well plates | ≤0.5 –>16 | 1 × 104 CFU / spot | MHA (CAMHB + 1.7% Agar) |
Comparably labor intensive; single isolate test runs possible by using 8-well microtiter strips; |
Wiegand et al. [16] |
Etest, MIC Test Strip | Agar gradient diffusion | ≤0.016 –>256 | McF 0.5 streaked with sterile swab | MHE (bioMérieux), MHA (Oxoid), MHA (BD) |
Suitable for routine application; single isolate test runs possible; For Etest, use of MHE plates is mandatory; For Etest, only Enterobacteriaceae must be tested for diagnostic use; Comparably expensive; |
FSCA 3061, FSCA 3206 |
VITEK 2 | Card-based, semiautomated AST (manual inoculum preparation, automated incubation and reading) | ≤0.5 –>16 | McF 0.5–0.63 | Contained in the test card | Suitable for routine application; single isolate test runs possible; Colistin susceptible test results require confirmation; |
Dafopoulou et al.[17] FSCA 3490 |
SensiTest | Commercially available 4-test BMD panel containing dried colistin in 7 two-fold dilutions | ≤0.25 –>16 | 5 × 105 CFU / mL | CAMHB (Liofilchem, provided with assay) |
Suitable for routine application; Comparably expensive; simultaneous AST of four isolates per panel required for optimum cost-efficiency; |
Matuschek et al.[18] |