Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;14(6):e0217468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217468

Table 1. Colistin AST methods compared in this study.

VITEK 2 cards were incubated and evaluated automatically by the device, all other tests were incubated at 36 ± 2°C for 16–20 hours in ambient air. McF, McFarland standard; CAMHB, cation-adjusted Muller-Hinton II broth; QC, quality control; MHA, Muller-Hinton agar; BMD, broth microdilution; FSCA, Field Safety Corrective Action.

Test Description MIC range
(mg / L)
Inoculum Medium used in this study Comment Reference
Broth microdilution In-house prepared serial dilution of colistin sulfate in untreated polystyrene 96-well plates ≤0.25 –>128 5 × 105 CFU / mL CAMHB
(Sigma-Aldrich)
EUCAST and CLSI reference method;
comparably labor intensive;
single isolate test runs possible;
ISO 20776–1[15]
Agar dilution In-house prepared serial dilution of colistin sulfate in untreated polystyrene 96-well plates ≤0.5 –>16 1 × 104 CFU / spot MHA
(CAMHB + 1.7% Agar)
Comparably labor intensive;
single isolate test runs possible by using 8-well microtiter strips;
Wiegand et al. [16]
Etest, MIC Test Strip Agar gradient diffusion ≤0.016 –>256 McF 0.5 streaked with sterile swab MHE
(bioMérieux),
MHA
(Oxoid),
MHA
(BD)
Suitable for routine application;
single isolate test runs possible;
For Etest, use of MHE plates is mandatory;
For Etest, only Enterobacteriaceae must be tested for diagnostic use;
Comparably expensive;
FSCA 3061, FSCA 3206
VITEK 2 Card-based, semiautomated AST (manual inoculum preparation, automated incubation and reading) ≤0.5 –>16 McF 0.5–0.63 Contained in the test card Suitable for routine application;
single isolate test runs possible;
Colistin susceptible test results require confirmation;
Dafopoulou et al.[17]
FSCA 3490
SensiTest Commercially available 4-test BMD panel containing dried colistin in 7 two-fold dilutions ≤0.25 –>16 5 × 105 CFU / mL CAMHB
(Liofilchem, provided with assay)
Suitable for routine application;
Comparably expensive;
simultaneous AST of four isolates per panel required for optimum cost-efficiency;
Matuschek et al.[18]