Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: City Community. 2018 Sep 27;17(3):754–787. doi: 10.1111/cico.12317

TABLE 5.

ESTIMATES OF CHANGES IN NEIGHBORHOOD CONCENTRATION OF ARTISTS AND CHANGES IN THE DENSITY OF ART ORGANIZATIONS OVER TIME

CHANGE IN ARTIST CONCENTRATION (1990-2000)
CHANGE IN DENSITY OF ART NPOs (1990-2006)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(a) Raw Change (b) Resid. Change (a) Raw Change (b) Resid. Change (a) Raw Change (b) Resid. Change (a) Raw Change (b) Resid. Change
Time Lagged Variables (1990)
 Inter-Cultural Diversity.................. .234 *** (.037) .166 *** (.038) .172*** (.045) .175 *** (.046) .037 *** (.009) .042 *** (.008) .039 *** (.011) .043 *** (.010)
 Diversity of Ancestry.................... .565 *** (.052) .018 (.039) .470 *** (.060) .024 (.053) .070 *** (.010) .032 *** (.008) .050 *** (.015) .022 (.012)
 Socioeconomic Disadvantage........... −.174* (.069) −.093 (.065) .007 (.017) .006 (.014)
 Population Density (a)................... .011 (.008) −.014 (.008) −.002 (.002) −.001 (.002)
 Median Rent (a)......................... .187 (.371) −.842 * (.383) .023 (.089) −.008 (.085)
 Gay Concentration........................ .906 *** (.128) .169 (.099) .858 *** (.127) .212 * (.100) .017 (.029) −.048 * (.021) −.017 (.032) −.069 ** (.023)
 Artist Concentration..................... −.532 *** (.032) −.573 *** (.035) .022 * (.010) .019 * (.008)
 Density of Art Organizations............ .022 (.033) .012 (.033)
Interdecade Difference Scores (1990-2000)
 Change in Inter-Cultural Diversity...... −.145 (.088) .129 (.088) −.207 * (.089) .069 (.090) −.018 (.020) − .018 (.019) −.007 (.021) −.008 (.020)
 Change in Diversity of Ancestry....... .692 *** (.083) .477 *** (.086) .596 *** (.087) .448 *** (.091) .098 *** (.020) .103 *** (.018) .068 ** (.021) .080 *** (.020)
 Change in Socioec. Disadvantage...... −.379 *** (.083) −.263 ** (.087) −.038 (.020) −.038 * (.019)
 Change in Population Density (a)....... −.029 (.021) −.059 ** (.022) −.006 (.005) −.006 (.005)
 Change in Median Rent (a)............. .415 (.289) −.359 (.291) .033 (.071) .017 (.065)
 Change in Gay Concentration........... .582 *** (.101) .319 ** (.103) .543 *** (.100) .355 *** (.104) .055 * (.023) .032 (.022) .040 (.024) .019 (.023)
 Change in Artist Concentration........ .009 (.008) .001 (.008)
Density of Starbucks Stores (b)........... .160** (.058) .116* (.049) .141 * (.060) .088 (.051)
Spatial Dependence (Rho)................ .254 *** (.040) .331 *** (.043) .244 *** (.040) .299 *** (.043) .080 (.048) .069 (.048) .052 (.048) .046 (.048)
Intercept.................................... .433 *** (.050) −.008 (.035) .238 (.185) .459 ** (.175) .074 *** (.011) .006 (.008) .060 (.044) .002 (.038)

R-square .378 .235 .397 .255 .149 .140 .164 .154
Akaike Information Criterion 2256 2336 2241 2321 −153 −275 −152 −274
Log Likelihood −1119 −1160 −1105 −1147 86 147 94 154

NOTE.-- Maximum likelihood spatial models. Standard errors in parentheses.

(a) Coefficients and standard errors are multipled by 1000. (b) Starbucks store data was collected in 2004

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05,

p<.10