Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 9;41(3):630–666. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00816-4

Table 2.

Characteristics of uncontrolled studies included in the systematic review

Study year
Country
Study design (duration) Study setting Aim Participants Pharmacist interventions Main clinical outcomes achieved
N (at baseline) Age (years), mean (SD)

Kelly et al. (2008)

United Kingdom [43]

Prospective uncontrolled study (18 months) Diabetes unit of a secondary hospital To offer stepwise intensive treatment to patients with diabetic nephropathy picked up at the traditional secondary care clinic 116 diabetic nephropathy patients 63.4 (8.6) Frequent visits to pharmacist led clinic for treatment optimisation, checking of BP, renal function, HbA1c, ACR, FBC, calcium and phosphate. Medical history taking by two sources Significant improvements in BP (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and HbA1c (p < 0.05)

Dashti-Khavidaki et al. (2009)

Iran [51]

Prospective uncontrolled study (12 months) Nephrology and infectious disease wards of a large university hospital To understand the types of services provided by clinical pharmacists in nephrology and infectious disease wards, the acceptance by physicians and the clinical significance of these services 1105 CKD patients 52.5 (14.1) Uniform documentation of all clinical pharmacy residents activities and interventions Not reported

Vessal (2010)

Iran [17]

Prospective uncontrolled study (4 months) Nephrology ward of a university hospital To determine the impact of a clinical pharmacist on detection and prevention of prescription errors at the nephrology ward of a referral hospital 76 CKD patients 47.7 (17.2) CP reviewed medication orders and intervention was made after agreement of the attending physician Although 89.5% of the detected errors caused no harm, 4(4.7%) of the errors increased the need for monitoring, 2 (2.3%) increased length of stay, and 2 (2.3%) led to permanent patient harm

Castelino et al. (2011)

India [29]

Prospective uncontrolled study (8 months) Department of nephrology of a teaching hospital To explore the potential clinical significance of the MRPs and the acceptance of recommendations made by clinical pharmacists 308 CKD patients NR Medication history interview, clinical and medication review by pharmacist. Recommendation were reported to the health care team Not reported

Ohnishi et al. (2011)

Japan [34]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (12 months) Outpatient haemodialysis unit of a tertiary hospital To explore the role of the pharmacists’ participation, we examined the influence of haemoglobin levels anteroposterior the participation 84 HD patients 62 Pharmacists provided drug information on renal anaemia to physicians, performed medication use evaluations based on laboratory data, proposed plans to change prescriptions based on medication use evaluations and provided drug information and lifestyle care point to patients The counselling by pharmacists significantly decreased haemoglobin levels in the high group (12 g/dl) and significantly increased them in low group (10 g/dL)

Belaiche et al. (2012a)

France [21]

Prospective uncontrolled study (6 months) University hospital based nephrology clinic To identify DRPs by a trained CP, their frequency and associated comorbidities 67 CKD patients 70 The CP interviewed patients and established a pharmacological profile, checked for drug–drug interactions, verified dose adaptation according to the last renal function tests and searched for self-medication and its potential nephrotoxicity. The pharmaceutical proposals were validated with the consulting nephrologist so as to optimise therapy during the following renal consultation Not reported

Belaiche et al. (2012b)

France [28]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (15 months) Nephrology clinics of a university hospital To assess the impact of clinical pharmacy services in outpatient nephrology clinics 42 CKD patients 64.9 (2.2) Identification of DRPs by CP and documentation of recommendations Not reported

Dashti-Khavidaki et al. (2012)

Iran [23]

Prospective uncontrolled study (6 months) Haemodialysis treatment centre of a teaching hospital To assess the impact of clinical pharmacy services on the management of secondary complications in patients who were on HD, including bone metabolism disorders, anaemia and dyslipidaemia 86 HD NR CP reviewed patients medications and proposed modification according to laboratory data results to treating physicians

Serum Calcium was increased in hypocalcaemia patients and decreased in hypercalcaemia patients until it reached the optimal range in both groups

A decline in serum Phosphate level was noted in hyperphosphataemia patients

There was an increase and decrease in serum iPTH in suboptimal and supraoptimal range patients, respectively

Haemoglobin concentration increased in anaemic patients and serum ferritin reached target values in all patients. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides decreased to near-optimal values in dyslipidaemia patients

Geerts et al. (2012)

Netherlands [33]

Prospective uncontrolled study (unclear) Primary health care To assess the therapeutic advice formulated by pharmacists with help of a pharmacy medication alert system based on the renal function of patients aged ≥ 70 years with diabetes or cardiovascular disease 650 CKD patients 81 (6.7) The pharmacists used a pharmacy medication alert system to assess the medication in relation to the reported eGFR and provided an alert for target drugs according to the Dutch guidelines for drug administration in reduced renal function Not reported

Abu Ruz et al. (2013)

Jordan [37]

Prospective uncontrolled study (3 months) Nephrology ward of a general teaching hospital To implement and evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical care service for hospitalised CKD patients in Jordan 130 CKD patients 56.3 (17.8) The pharmacist Identified TRPs and interventions were discussed during ward rounds. Patients education and interview to improve patient adherence 17% of all TRPs were resolved, 5.5%were improved, and 37.4%were prevented through the clinical pharmacist interventions

Chen (2013)

Singapore [25]

Prospective uncontrolled study (5 months) Haemodialysis centre of a general hospital To evaluate the prevalence of DRPs identified and the types of interventions made by MMS pharmacists 30 HD 62.3 (10.0) Patients requested to bring their medication and see the pharmacist before the appointment with their physician. Pharmacist reviewed patients records, counsel the patients, identified and reported DRPs Not reported

Jiang et al. (2013)

Japan [38]

Prospective uncontrolled study (24 months) Medical and surgical ICU of a university-affiliated hospital To evaluate the benefits that may result from involving pharmacists in the care of septic patients receiving CRRT

144 Pre-intervention (71 patients)

Post-intervention (73 patients) CRRT

Pre-intervention: 62.3 (17.0)

Post-intervention: 57.9 (15.4)

Pharmacists completed 1 month of training before the study was started

During the intervention period, the pharmacists assessed septic patients receiving CRRT daily and adjusted the dosage of antimicrobial drugs when needed. Recommendations were made to physicians and nurses at that time. All pharmacist recommendations were verbal and recorded on a specially designed pharmacist intervention form

Dosing adjustments were related to a reduced length of ICU stay from 10.7 ± 11.1 days to 7.7 ± 8.3 days (p = 0.037) in the intervention group, and to cost savings of 3525 USD (13,463 ± 12,045 vs. 9938 ± 8811, p = 0.038) per septic patient receiving CRRT in the ICU

Suspected antimicrobial adverse drug events in the intervention group were significantly fewer than in the pre-intervention group (19 events vs. 8 events, p = 0.048)

Dosing error events were significantly fewer in the post-intervention phase than in the pre-intervention phase (54 in 73 patients vs. 194 in 71 patients, p < 0.001)

Mousavi et al. (2013)

Iran [22]

Retrospective/Prospective uncontrolled study (12 months) University hospital based nephrology wards To evaluate appropriateness of acid suppression therapy in kidney disease patients and to assess the role of clinical pharmacists to decrease inappropriate SUP prescribing and related costs for these patients

Pre-test phase (375 patients)

Post-test phase (236 patients)

Pre-test phase 51.2 (18.3)

Post-test phase 50.2 (18.8)

Pre-intervention phase: patient chart review by CP, develop SUP protocol, and provide educational sessions to doctors on SUP

Post-intervention phase: Clinical pharmacists accompanied physicians on the ward rounds and advised on starting or stopping SUP

Not reported

Rani et al. (2013)

India [50]

Prospective uncontrolled study (3 months) Dialysis unit of a multispecialty university hospital To assess the medication knowledge of CKD patients undergoing HD, to assess the effect of a CP provided continuous patient education in improving medication adherence and to evaluate the association between medication knowledge and medication adherence behaviour in HD patients 85 HD patients 50.52 (13.28) Patient counselling and education (verbally and written). Patient interview to assess medication knowledge using MKAQ. To assess medication adherence pattern using BMQ Not reported

Aberger et al. (2014)

USA [41]

Prospective uncontrolled study (4 weeks) Transplant clinic of a large urban hospital To describes a telehealth system approach and preliminary results for the management of BP in renal transplant recipients and to enhance patient engagement and improve adherence to medications via a collaborative care, pharmacist-based, MTM program 66 Tx patietns 54 Telehealth system encompassing: home electronic BP monitoring designed to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. The pharmacist communicates BP reading data and dose modifications to the physician Statistically significant reductions in average systolic and diastolic BP of 6.0 mm Hg and 3.0 mm Hg, respectively, at 30 days after enrolment (p < 0.01)

Arrabal-Durán et al. (2014)

Spain [26]

Prospective uncontrolled study (10 months) Hospital wards and emergency department of a general university hospital To assess the characteristics of pharmaceutical interventions concerning the dose adjustment of these drugs in patients with CRF who are admitted into hospital 181 CKD patients 77.6 (12.5) Medical history of each patient was reviewed by CP, recommendations for an adjustment were put in writing for the doctors Not reported

Barnes et al. (2014)

USA [27]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (12 months) Primary care setting, Patient -Centred Medical Home associated with a major, academic health system To increase the identification of CKD as a medical problem, increase the use of aspirin and ACEIs/ARBs in patients with CKD, and ensure that all medications prescribed to patients with CKD were dosed appropriately based on CG calculated CrCl 146 CKD patients 71.6 (12.2) Review EMRs to identify CKD patients, review medication list, estimate CrCl and recommendations reporting to the physicians Not reported

Gheewala et al. (2014)

Australia [19]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (12 months) Aged care facilities

To investigate the number and nature of DRPs identified and recommendations made by pharmacists in residents of aged care facilities

To determine the extent of inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared medications in residents with CKD

847 CKD patients 84.9 (8.8) DRPs identified, and recommendations made to resolve those DRPs by CP Not reported

Holm et al. (2015)

Norway [24]

Prospective uncontrolled study (6 months) Internal medicine department of a general hospital To describe the use of renal risk drugs in a population of patients with RI in an internal medicine department and investigate possible risk factors for such DRPs 79 CKD patients 78.7 (10.2) The CP reviewed the patients’ drug regimen to classify DRPs related to renal function. DRPs identified were discussed with the physician There was a significant correlation between the patients’ GFR and the number of DRPs, with an increasing number of DRPs with deteriorating renal function (p = 0.001, r = 0.371)

Pourrat et al. (2015)

France [16]

Prospective uncontrolled study (7 months) Community pharmacies (1) To evaluate the ability of community pharmacists to identify drug related problems (DRP) in patients at risk for or suffering from renal impairment. (2) To evaluate the proportions of recommendations by CPs that lead to a modification by GP 177 CKD patients 78.1

The community pharmacist filled an electronic form for each prescription and verify whether the drug had to be adapted to renal function or was contraindicated

Potential modification was proposed to the GP

Not reported

Venkateswararao et al. (2015)

India [49]

Prospective uncontrolled study (6 months) Dialysis unit of a teaching hospital

To evaluate the patient perception and degree of adherence to various treatment modalities (medication use, dialysis, life style modifications) by renal failure patients on HD

To assess the effect of pharmacist’s interventions towards improving the adherence among the study population

58 HD patients 46.7 (13.3) Patient counselling once in 2 weeks (total 3 sessions) was provided. Printed information leaflets and written information on dialysis note in regional language were provided to the patients. Adherence pattern before and after patient educational intervention was assessed Not reported

Patricia and Foote (2016)

USA [46]

Prospective uncontrolled study (17 months) Regional dialysis units To identify the extent and type of medication discrepancies and MRPs experienced by dialysis patients during pharmacist-initiated medication reviews and determine if the resulting recommendations made by the pharmacy team to the patient’s provider were accepted 90 HD NR Patients requested to bring their medication to dialysis unit and medication reconciliation conducted by the pharmacy team Not reported

Ramadaniati et al. (2016)

Indonesia [31]

Prospective uncontrolled study (3 months) Medical wards and an ICCU in a major teaching hospital To identify and evaluate drug-related problems (DRPs) in patients with CKD 105 CKD NR Identification of DRPs through the direct patient interview, discussion with nurses and assessment of patients’ medication charts and medical records Not reported

Adibe et al. (2017)

Nigeria [42]

Prospective uncontrolled study (5 months) Nephrology units of three tertiary hospitals To determine the prevalence of DTPs, identify the types of DTPs, and assess the outcomes of DTP interventions among renal patients receiving care in three Nigerian tertiary hospitals 287 patients with renal illnesses 72.34 (7.56) Identify and report DRPs. Patient education and counselling Not reported

Alshamrani et al. (2018)

Saudi Arabia [59]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (3 months) Outpatient haemodialysis unit of a tertiary hospital To determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and the Medication Related Problems in haemodialysis patients 83 HD patients Median age 63, IQR (49–1) The pharmacy resident reviewed electronic medical records and analysed each medication regimen for eligible patients to identify MRPs Not reported

Chandrasekhar et al. (2018)

India [60]

Prospective interventional study (12 months) Outpatient nephrology department To evaluate medication adherence behaviour of patients using questionnaire and enhance adherence by various cost effective interventions which have greater effect on the health of patients with CKD 163 CKD patients Patient counselling by pharmacist and patient information leaflet was carried out using a proper management plan and with the help of physician and feedback information was collected Not reported

Imamura et al. (2018)

Japan [61]

Retrospective uncontrolled study (unclear) Hospital To determine whether multidisciplinary care could help prevent worsening renal function associated with CKD 150 CKD patients 72.3 (10.5) The multidisciplinary care was provided by a team of nephrologists, diabetologist, nurses, diabetes educator, dietitians and pharmacists

The eGFR significantly improved between before and after multidisciplinary care from − 5.46 to − 0.56 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively

Values for uric acid, LDL, and HbA1c were significantly reduced among patients with improved eGFR

ACEi angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ACR albumin:creatinine ratio, ARBs angiotensin receptor blockers, BMQ Brief medication questionnaire, BP blood pressure, CrCl creatinine clearance, CG Cockcroft-Gault, CKD chronic kidney disease, CP clinical pharmacist, CRF chronic renal failure, CRRT Continuous renal replacement therapy, DRPs drug related problems, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, EMRs electronic medical records, FBC full blood count, GFR glomerular filtration rate, GP general practitioner, HbA1c glycosylated haemoglobin, HD haemodialysis, ICCU intensive critical care unit, ICU intensive care unit, iPTH intact parathyroid hormone, IQR interquartile range, MKAQ Medication knowledge assessment questionnaire, MMS medication management service, MRPs medication related problems, MTM medication therapy management, NR not reported, RI renal impairment, SUP stress ulcer prophylaxis, TRPs therapy related problems, Tx transplantation