Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;9:8320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42752-3

Table 1.

Comparison of hydrogen production found in different studies by using wastes as the substrate.

S. no Microbes Wastes Yield References
1 Thermoanaerobacterium, Caloribacterium, and Caldanaerobius Species (thermophilic consortium) Human waste stimulants, Wastewater, and Activated sludge 4 mmol H2/g (from human waste), 5.7 mmol H2/g (from waste water), and 2.2 mmol H2/g (from activated sludge) 42
2 Rhodobacter capsulatus JP91 Glucose 7.8 mol H2/mol glucose 45
3 Mixed culture Sugar beet 198 mL H2 g−1 TOC 47
4 Klebsiella peneumoniae (Inoculum produced by isolating microorganism from aviary litter). Brewery waste water 0.80–1.67 mol H2/mol glucose 48
5 Thermotoga maritima DSM 3109 Fruit and vegetable wastes 3.46 mol H2/mol 49
6 R. capsulatus DSM 1710, R. capsulatus YO3, R. sphaeroides O.U.001 and Rp. palustris DSM 127 Sugar beet molasses 12.7 ± 0.7 mol H2/mol sucrose 10.6 ± 0.4 mol H2/mol sucrose 9.4 ± 0.5 mol H2/mol sucrose and 19.0 ± 0.5 mol H2/mol sucrose respectively 50
7 Seed sludge Dairy cow solid waste 500 mL H2/g total sugar 40
8 Enterobacter aerogenes Rice straw 19.7 mL H2/g dry rice straw 51
9 Granule sludge Vinasse 14.8 mL H2/g VS substrate 52
10 Bacillus licheniformis AP1 Kitchen waste 17.6 mmol H2/g COD 53
11 Lactobacillus acidophilus Cheese waste 1 mol of H2 produced/mol of the hexose This study