Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2016 Feb 3;53(3):674–680. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw004

Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons of transmission efficiency estimates by concentration group

Concentration groups compared Difference (95% CI) between transmission efficiency estimates
109 vs. 108 12.2 (−7.1, 83.9)
109 vs. 107 a 17.4 (2.7, 86.6)
109 vs. 106 a 18.5 (5.0, 47.1)
109 vs. 105 a 18.5 (4.5, 47.1)
109 vs. 104 a 18.5 (4.9, 47.1)
108 vs. 107 5.2 (−4.9, 19.6)
108 vs. 106 6.3 (−2.2, 25.0)
108 vs. 105 6.3 (−3.2, 25.0)
108 vs. 104 6.3 (−2.3, 25.0)
108 vs. 103 6.3 (−17.8, 25.0)
107 vs. 106 1.1 (−6.1, 17.8)
107 vs. 105 1.1 (−7.2, 17.8)
107 vs. 104 1.1 (−6.1, 17.8)
107 vs. 103 1.1 (−22.7, 17.8)
106 vs. 105 0.0 (−11.0, 9.4)
106 vs. 104 0.0 (−9.5, 9.4)
106 vs. 103 0.0 (−28.6, 9.4)
105 vs. 104 0.0 (−9.5, 11.0)
105 vs. 103 0.0 (−28.6, 11.0)
104 vs. 103 0.0 (−28.6, 9.5)
a

Transmission efficiency between groups is significantly different when CI does not include zero (α=0.05 with Bonferroni correction).