Table 2.
Concentration groups compared | Difference (95% CI) between transmission efficiency estimates |
---|---|
109 vs. 108 | 12.2 (−7.1, 83.9) |
109 vs. 107 a | 17.4 (2.7, 86.6) |
109 vs. 106 a | 18.5 (5.0, 47.1) |
109 vs. 105 a | 18.5 (4.5, 47.1) |
109 vs. 104 a | 18.5 (4.9, 47.1) |
108 vs. 107 | 5.2 (−4.9, 19.6) |
108 vs. 106 | 6.3 (−2.2, 25.0) |
108 vs. 105 | 6.3 (−3.2, 25.0) |
108 vs. 104 | 6.3 (−2.3, 25.0) |
108 vs. 103 | 6.3 (−17.8, 25.0) |
107 vs. 106 | 1.1 (−6.1, 17.8) |
107 vs. 105 | 1.1 (−7.2, 17.8) |
107 vs. 104 | 1.1 (−6.1, 17.8) |
107 vs. 103 | 1.1 (−22.7, 17.8) |
106 vs. 105 | 0.0 (−11.0, 9.4) |
106 vs. 104 | 0.0 (−9.5, 9.4) |
106 vs. 103 | 0.0 (−28.6, 9.4) |
105 vs. 104 | 0.0 (−9.5, 11.0) |
105 vs. 103 | 0.0 (−28.6, 11.0) |
104 vs. 103 | 0.0 (−28.6, 9.5) |
Transmission efficiency between groups is significantly different when CI does not include zero (α=0.05 with Bonferroni correction).