Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 7;9:8353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44342-9

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Electrophysiological compound muscle action potential data (A) and latency data (B) for the experimental groups. There was no significant difference in motor versus sensory autograft trends throughout the experimental timeline. From the week 9 mark and forward, mean amplitude in millivolts (mV) and mean latency in milliseconds (ms) were greater for both the motor and sensory groups in comparison to the control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, student’s t-test).