Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 7;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0194-z

Table 3.

Risk of bias

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data
Alvarez et al. 2016 [12] Low High Low High
Belli et al. 2011 [28] Low High High High
Kadoglou et al. 2007 [35] Low High High High
Kadoglou et al. 2012 [44] Low High High High
Lambers et al. 2008 [29] Low Low Low High
Mitranun et al. 2014 [23] Low High High High
Negri et al. 2010 [30] Low High High High
Oliveira et al. 2012 [31] Low High High High
Sentinelli et al. 2014 [32] Low High High Low
Tomar et al. 2013 [33] Low High High Low
Vancea et al. 2009 [45] Low High High Low
Yavari et al. 2012 [34] Low High High Low
Blonk et al. 1994 [36] High High Unclear High
Church et al. 2010 [20] Low High Low Low
Emereziani et al. 2015 [37] Low High High Low
Giannopoulou et al. 2005 [38] High High High High
Jorge et al. 2011 [22] Low High High Low
Karstoft et al. 2013 [21] Low High Low High
Kwon et al. 2011 [39] Low High High High
Midlebrooke et al. 2006 [40] Low High High High
Nuttamonwarakul et al. 2012 [46] Low High High Low
Parra-Sanchez et al. 2015 [41] Low Low Low High
Shenoy et al. 2009 [42] Low High High High
Yan et al. 2014 [43] Low High High Low