Skip to main content
. 2019 May 29;23:101879. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101879

Table 2.

Quantitative MR parameters.

Groups RRMS PMS HC
Scanner 1/Scanner 2 11/4 15/6 11/25
Volumetric Data, %, mean (SD)
BPF 84.99 (2.02) 83.67 (2.47)b 85.39 (1.75)
GMF 51.06 (2.11) 48.49 (3.16)b 52.76 (1.99)
Lesion F 1.21 (0.98)a 2.26 (1.50) N/A



Median MPM values, mean (SD)
MT (p.u)
 NACGM 0.71 (0.09)c 0.68 (0.09)b 0.82 (0.09)
 NADGM 0.91 (0.12) 0.83 (0.10)b 0.98 (1.13)
 NAWM 1.49 (0.18)c 1.45 (0.16)b 1.68 (0.14)
 Lesion 0.96 (0.26) 0.89 (0.24) N/A
R2* (Hz)
 NACGM 15.20 (1.19)c 15.35 (1.17)b 16.62 (1.02)
 NADGM 20.74 (2.63) 22.46 (2.94) 22.04 (3.10)
 NAWM 20.08 (1.34)c 20.24 (1.27)b 21.60 (1.03)
 Lesion 15.03 (2.23) 14.51 (2.30) N/A
R1 (Hz)
 NACGM 0.62 (0.02)c 0.61 (0.03)b 0.64 (0.02)
 NADGM 0.75 (0.05) 0.75 (0.05) 0.77 (0.06)
 NAWM 0.99 (0.05)c 0.99 (0.05)b 1.04 (0.03)
 Lesion 0.78 (0.12) 0.75 (0.10) N/A

Abbreviations: BPF = brain parenchymal fraction, GMF = grey matter fraction, Lesion F = lesion fraction, NACGM = normal appearing cortical grey matter, NADGM = normal appearing deep grey matter, NAWM = normal appearing white matter, N/A = not applicable.

a

Difference between RRMS and PMS statistically significant (alpha value of 0.05).

b

Difference between PMS and HC statistically significant (alpha value of 0.05).

c

Difference between RRMS and HC statistically significant (alpha value of 0.05).