Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;92(5):717–728. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01407-6

Table 3.

Association between repeated exposure to high ICT demands at work at T1 and/or T2, and risk of developing suboptimal SRH at T3, in the total study sample and in men and women

Crude Adjusted for age, sexa and SEP Adjusted for age, sexa, SEP, health behaviours and BMI Adjusted for age, sexa, SEP, health behaviours, BMI and job strain Adjusted for age, sexa, SEP, health behaviours BMI, job strain and social support
OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95%
Total study sample
Exposure to ICT demands at work n = 4468 n = 4273 n = 4184 n = 4170 n = 4137
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 1959) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 584) 0.99 0.74–1.32 1.03 0.76–1.39 1.03 0.76–1.40 1.02 0.75–1.39 1.01 0.74–1.37
 Non-exposureT1, exposure T2 (n = 583) 0.86 0.63–1.16 0.94 0.68–1.28 0.93 0.67–1.28 0.93 0.68–1.29 0.93 0.67–1.29
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 1342) 1.36 1.11–1.67 1.45 1.16–1.81 1.41 1.12–1.77 1.38 1.09–1.74 1.34 1.06–1.70
 Interaction ICT demands*sex, p value 0.010 0.010 0.056 0.041 0.043
Men n = 1941 n = 1807 n = 1781 n = 1774 n = 1760
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 890) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 246) 1.09 0.72–1.67 1.10 0.70–1.71 1.05 0.67–1.65 1.06 0.67–1.67 1.04 0.66–1.64
 Non-exposureT1, exposure T2 (n = 227) 1.20 0.79–1.84 1.33 0.85–2.09 1.32 0.84–2.08 1.36 0.86–2.15 1.37 0.86–2.16
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 578) 1.49 1.11–2.01 1.66 1.20–2.31 1.57 1.12–2.20 1.59 1.14–2.24 1.53 1.09–2.16
Women n = 2527 n = 2466 n = 2403 n = 2396 n = 2377
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 1069) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 338) 0.91 0.61–1.36 0.96 0.64–1.45 1.00 0.66–1.51 0.97 0.64–1.46 0.97 0.64–1.47
 Non-exposureT1, exposure T2 (n = 356) 0.64 0.41–1.00 0.68 0.43–1.06 0.65 0.41–1.05 0.65 0.40–1.03 0.64 0.40–1.03
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 764) 1.27 0.96–1.68 1.28 0.94–1.74 1.25 0.91–1.72 1.19 0.86–1.64 1.17 0.85–1.62

aSex was only adjusted for in the analyses of the total study population