Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;92(5):717–728. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01407-6

Table 4.

Association between repeated exposure to high ICT demands at work at T1 and/or T2, and risk of developing suboptimal SRH at T3, in participants with low, intermediate and high SEP

Crude Adjusted for age and sex Adjusted for age, sex, health behaviours and BMI Adjusted for age, sex, health behaviours, BMI and job strain Adjusted for age, sex, health behaviours, BMI, job strain and social support
OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95% OR CI 95%
Low SEP
Exposure to ICT demands at work n = 1259 n = 1259 n = 1227 n = 1222 n = 1212
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 835) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 147) 1.28 0.78–2.08 1.29 0.79–2.12 1.37 0.83–2.26 1.37 0.83–2.27 1.37 0.83–2.27
 Non-exposure T1, exposure T2 (n = 119) 1.07 0.61–1.88 1.09 0.62–1.93 1.14 0.64–2.03 1.16 0.65–2.07 1.21 0.68–2.17
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 158) 1.61 1.03–2.52 1.63 1.04–2.56 1.65 1.04–2.62 1.66 1.04–2.64 1.67 1.04–2.66
 Interaction ICT demands*SEP, p value (Total study sample) 0.110 0.176 0.257 0.293 0.271
Intermediate SEP n = 2024 n = 2024 n = 1982 n = 1976 n = 1966
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 742) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 288) 0.95 0.61–1.46 0.95 0.61–1.47 0.93 0.60–1.45 0.87 0.55–1.36 0.86 0.55–1.35
 Non-exposure T1, exposure T2 (n = 275) 0.72 0.44–1.16 0.72 0.44–1.16 0.66 0.40–1.10 0.65 0.39–1.08 0.64 0.39–1.07
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 719) 1.24 0.91–1.69 1.22 0.90–1.67 1.15 0.84–1.59 1.09 0.78–1.51 1.07 0.77–1.49
High SEP n = 990 n = 990 n = 975 n = 972 n = 959
 Non-exposure T1, T2 (n = 310) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
 Exposure T1, non-exposure T2 (n = 127) 0.77 0.35–1.68 0.76 0.35–1.66 0.70 0.32–1.57 0.73 0.33–1.63 0.70 0.31–1.57
 Non-exposureT1, exposure T2 (n = 157) 1.22 0.65–2.31 1.23 0.65–2.33 1.23 0.64–2.37 1.29 0.66–2.50 1.27 0.65–2.46
 Exposure T1 & T2 (n = 396) 1.76 1.10–2.84 1.75 1.08–2.83 1.64 0.99–2.69 1.68 1.02–2.79 1.56 0.94–2.60

SEP was only adjusted for in the analyses of the total study population