Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Aug 27;33(11):1940–1947. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3550

Table 5.

Multiple linear regression: Effect of vitamin D metabolites on muscle-related outcomes


Δ25(OH)D
(N=302)
Δ1,25(OH)2D
(N=302)
ΔiPTH
(N=302)
ΔMuscle Outcomes N Beta p-value Beta p-value Beta p-value



  Fat-Free Soft Tissue (kg) 300 −0.034 0.562 −0.003 0.954 0.112 0.054
  Handgrip Strength (kg) 285 0.028 0.653 0.074 0.232 0.046 0.464
  Forearm MCSA (mm2) 299 0.025 0.678 0.102 0.086 0.097 0.101
  Forearm MD (mg/cm3) 299 0.049 0.415 −0.029 0.629 0.002 0.971
  Forearm IMAT (mm2) 265 −0.053 0.413 0.093 0.147 0.135 0.035
  Calf MCSA (mm2) 296 0.015 0.811 0.085 0.158 0.180 0.003
  Calf MD (mg/cm3) 296 −0.038 0.526 0.025 0.677 −0.101 0.090
  Calf IMAT (mm2) 280 0.065 0.323 0.024 0.707 0.135 0.038
1.

Δ = Post-Baseline values

2.

Multiple linear regression controlling for race, sex, age, and latitude; Change in serum and muscle-related outcomes (post - baseline). Statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05 and in bold font. Beta coefficient displays strength or influence of the independent variable over the dependent variable.

3.

MCSA, muscle cross-sectional area; MD, muscle density; IMAT, intermuscular adipose tissue