Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;11(5):354–364. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354

Table 2.

Algorithms for guidance endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage

Ref. Design Proposed algorithm No. of patients Technical success rate Complication rate
Park et al[35] PS “Enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol” EUS-RV/EUS-AS with guidewire manipulation protocol as a first-line In case of failure or duodenal invasion, transmural EUS-BD 45 91% 11%
Tyberg et al[20] PS “Patient anatomy” Dilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received IHa Nondilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received EHa In case of failure of IHa, conversion to an EHa 52 96% 10%

PS: Prospective study; EUS-RV: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided rendez; EUS-AS: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided antegrade stent placement; EUS-BD: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage; IHBT: Intrahepatic biliary tree; IHa: Intrahepatic approach; EHa: Extrahepatic approach.