Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;11(5):354–364. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354

Table 4.

Advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques

Advantages Disadvantages
ERCP Widely available Relative low complication rate (compared to PTBD and EUS-BD) Not feasible in case of inaccessible papilla
PTBD Available rescue therapy for ERCP failure High complication rate (bleeding-infection) External catheter Contraindicated if ascites
EUS Different possible approaches (HGA, CDS, GBD, RV) Internal drainage Same session of failed ERCP Fewer re-interventions Not widely available High endoscopic ERCP/EUS expertise required Not yet standardized algorithm

ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PTBD: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasonography; EUS-BD: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage; HGA: Hepatogastric anastomosis; CDS: Choledochoduodenostomy; RV: Rendezvous; GBD: Transgallbladder drainage.