Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;15:100894. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100894

Table 5.

Census-weighted means (95% CI) for percent of eligible patients up-to-date with CRCS guidelines when interventions absent and present.

Intervention Absent Present p-value
1. Written policy for CRCS (formal/approved) 40.8 (32.3, 51.5) 31.1 (22.4, 43.2) 0.049
2. Written procedure/graphic workflow for CRCS 36.2 (27.3, 48.2) 41.2 (32.1, 52.9) 0.121
3. Standing orders for CRCS 36.5 (30.2, 44.2) 43.4 (31.6, 59.6) 0.026a
4. Clinical champion for CRCS 39.2 (30.4, 50.6) 39.7 (29.8, 52.9) 0.814
5. Patient outreach/recall for CRCS 37.9 (29.1, 49.5) 40.4 (31.2, 52.3) 0.180
6. Patient incentive for CRCS 38.5 (28.6, 51.8) 40.7 (31.7, 52.3) 0.412
7. Performance data shared at provider/team-level 38.5 (30.1, 48.1) 39.9 (30.1, 52.9) 0.534
8. Performance data shared at site and/or organization level 35.2 (27.6, 45.0) 39.8 (30.5, 51.8) <0.0001a
9. Provider alert in EHR that CRCS is needed 31.7 (25.1, 40.1) 40.3 (31.4, 51.9) <0.001a
10. Pre-visit chart review for CRCS 34.1 (25.7, 45.2) 40.0 (28.7, 55.6) 0.447
a

Significantly favor intervention.