Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;10(5):201–212. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i5.201

Table 3.

Treatment regimen variations in the intraperitoneal therapy, either in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant n (%)

Treatment regimens Total, n = 38 Adjuvant group, n = 25 Neoadjuvant group, n = 13
Taxol 175 mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 every 3 wk 21 (55.3) 14 (56) 7 (54)
Carboplatin AUC 5 or 6, Taxol 80 mg/m2 day 1, 8, 15 every 3 wk (dose dense) 3 (7.9) 2 (8) 1 (8)1
Taxol 80 mg/m2 day 1, 8, Carboplatin AUC 2 day 1, 8 every 3 wk (weekly regimen) 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 1 (8)
Carboplatin AUC 5 and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 wk 2 (5.2) 1 (4) 1 (8)
Carboplatin AUC 5 Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 day 1, 8 every 3 wk (due to peripheral neuropathy) 1 (2.6) 1 (4) 0 (0)
Carboplatin AUC 5 or 6, Abraxane D1, 8 every 3 wk (due to allergic reaction to Taxel) 3 (7.9) 1 (4) 2 (15)
Carboplatin AUC with Taxol x1, with Docetaxel x1 and with Gemcitabine x1 (due to allergic reaction) 1 (2.6) 1 (4) 0 (0)
No IV treatment, IP treatment only 6 (15.8) 5 (20) 1 (8)
Completion of ≥ 6 cycles of IV + IP treatment 34 (89.5) 22 (88) 12 (92)
Completion of 7-10 cycles of IV + IP 5 (13.1) 2 (8) 3 (23)
Subsequent treatment with Bevacizumab at progression 19 (50) 13 (52) 6 (46)
1

This patient also received Bevacizumab with dose dense regimen in the neoadjuvant period. IP: Intraperitoneal; IV: Intravenous.