Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;8:100168. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2019.05.001

Table 3.

Clinical and sociodemographic correlates of follow-up CHIAS scores by subfactora.


CHIAS Score (Points)b



Covariate Barriers Harms Ineffectiveness Uncertainties
Baseline Subfactor Score 0.3 (0.1), p < 0.01 0.5 (0.1), p < 0.01 0.4 (0.1), p < 0.01 0.5 (0.1), p < 0.01
Age at Sampling
 15 Years vs. 16 Years --c -- -- 0.6 (0.3), p = 0.04
Household Size at Baselined
 Small vs. Medium -- -- 1.2 (0.4), p < 0.01 0.3 (0.3), p = 0.46
 Large vs. Medium -- -- 0.2 (0.5), p = 0.64 1.2 (0.4), p < 0.01
 Unknown vs. Medium -- -- 0.4 (0.9), p = 0.64 -0.7 (0.7), p = 0.38
≥1 Prior HPV Vaccine
 Yes vs. No -- -0.8 (0.3), p = 0.02 -- -0.8 (0.3), p < 0.01
Healthcare Provider Recommendation of HPV Vaccine in the Last Year
 Yes vs. No -- -1.1 (0.5), p = 0.02 -- -1.6 (0.4), p < 0.01
 Unknown vs. No -- -1.3 (0.5), p = 0.02 -- -1.3 (0.5), p = 0.01
Discussed HPV Vaccine with Parents in the Last Year
 Yes vs. No -1.3 (0.4), p < 0.01 -- -- --
 Unknown vs. No 0.5 (0.8), p = 0.56 -- -- --
Internet, Trusted Source of Information on HPV Vaccine
 Yes vs. No -- -- -- 0.6 (0.3), p = 0.03
a

Manual forward model selection was used to generate a single multivariable linear regression model from covariates that met a p < 0.10 threshold in bivariate models.

b

Values are reported as point estimate (SE), p value. Compared to the reference category, or a 1-unit increase for continuous predictor variables, positive values indicate a higher CHIAS subfactor score and negative values indicate a lower (more favorable) CHIAS subfactor score. For example, 15 year old adolescents had a mean CHIAS uncertainties score that was 0.6 (0.3) points higher than 16 year old adolescents.

c

“–”indicates variable excluded from final multivariable model.

d

Household size was categorized as follows: small (2–3 members), medium (4–5 members), large (6+ members), and unknown.