Table 3. The Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) tests, evaluating monophyly of Himalayan lineages.

Topologies of False tree	lnL, constrained(A)	lnL, unconstrained(B)	delta lnL (δ) = (A)–(B)	s.d.	P
Constraint tree 1	−24,701.56	−23,096.69	−1,605.48	104.30	P < 0.01
Constraint tree 2	−17,317.09	−16,888.41	−427.60	46.52	P < 0.01
Constraint tree 3	−52,849.70	−50,206.00	−2,644.64	167.53	P < 0.01
Constraint tree 4	−84,061.72	−79,483.50	−4,577.86	231.26	P < 0.01
Constraint tree 5	−7,496.76	−7,495.88	−1.32	10.96	non-significant

Notes.

Constraint tree 1 = Himalayan species in Vignea clade are monophyletic.

Constraint tree 2 = Himalayan species in core Unispicate clade are monophyletic.

Constraint tree 3 = Himalayan species in core Carex clade are monophyletic.

Constraint tree 4 = Himalayan species in core Carex, core Unispicate and Vignea clades are monophyletic.

Constraint tree 5 = All Kobresia species are monophyletic.