Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Geriatr Med. 2019 Apr 3;10(3):413–420. doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00185-1

Table 2.

Logistic regression model

TOTAL NO-HBP HBP
Study groups OR p-value CI OR p-value CI OR p value CI
Unadjusted
1
2 0.96 0.81 (0.72 - 1.28) 0.78 0.19 (0.54 - 1.13) 1.37 0.19 (0.85 - 2.22)
3 1.56 0.05 (0.99 - 2.47) 1.13 0.72 (0.56 - 2.26) 2.43 0.007 (1.27 - 4.64)
4 1.31 0.11 (0.93 - 1.84) 0.68 0.2 (0.38 - 1.22) 2.25 0.001 (1.37 - 3.69)
Adjusted
1
2 0.86 0.34 (0.64 - 1.16) 0.69 0.059 (0.47 - 1.01) 1.29 0.31 (0.79 - 2.12)
3 1.34 0.21 (0.84 - 2.13) 1.01 0.97 (0.51 - 2.04) 2.11 0.03 (1.09 - 4.09)
4 1.04 0.80 (0.73 - 1.49) 0.53 0.041 (0.29 - 0.97) 1.91 0.01 (1.14 - 3.22)

Logistic regression model which displays the variables when assessed by SMC and DS status. Adjusted by sex, age, number of years in school, marital status, comorbidity, alcoholism, and visual deficits.

HBP=High Blood Pressure, 1=without SMC/ without DS, 2=with SMC/ without DS, 3=without SMC/ with DS, 4=with SMC/ with DS