Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Dec 21;1445(1):5–16. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13996

Table 3.

Study characteristics.

Authorref Control
type
Population Subject, n Control, n Meditation
intervention
Comparison intervention Meditation
duration,
weeks
Meditationa
hours
Scale /b V0 mean AssessmentTime-point Post-
interventionc
Follow-upd
(5–12 months)
Risk
of bias
Adler,et al.34 SAC Obesity 100 94 MBSR Progressive muscle relaxation 16 42 PSQI5.95 6-month12-month Ø L (9)
Garland,et al.30 SAC Cancer with insomnia 64 47 MBSR CBT-I 8 18 PSQI12.51 Post-intervention5-month - - M (7)
Gross,et al.31 SAC Insomnia 20 10 MBSR Drug 8 26 PSQI11.56 Post-intervention5-month M (8)
Schmidt,et al.35 SAC Fibromyalgia syndrome 53 56 MBSR Progressive muscle relaxation 8 27 PSQI11.34 Post-intervention Ø   M (8)
van der Zwan,et al.36 SAC High stress 27 23 MM Exercise 5 NR PSQI5.74 Post-intervention   M (7)
Vanhuffel,et al.37 SAC Insomnia 16 13 MBCT CBT-I 8 14 PSQI13.07 Post-intervention H (5)
Wong,et al.38 SAC Insomnia 101 95 MBCT-I Sleep psycho-education with exercise 8 20 ISI17.96 Post-intervention8-month + Ø L (9)
Black,et al.39 NSAC Older adults with sleep disturbance 24 25 MAPs Sleep hygiene education 6 12 PSQI10.2 Post-intervention +   L (11)
Dykens,et al.40 NSAC Mothers withdisabled children 94 108 MBSR Positive adult development 6 9 ISI12.34 Post-intervention7.5-monthe + Ø M (8)
Gross,et al.41 NSAC Organ transplant 71 66 MBSR Health education 8 26 PSQI7.77 Post-intervention12-month + + M (7)
Hoge,et al.42 NSAC General anxiety disorder 48 41 MBSR Stress management education 8 20 PSQI8.26 Post-intervention +   M (8)
Johns,et al.43 NSAC Breast and colorectal cancer 35 36 MBSR Psychoeducation support group 8 16 ISI16.35 Post-intervention6-month Ø Ø L (12)
Malarkey,et al.44 NSAC Cardiovascular disease risk 93 93 MBSR-low dose Lifestyle education 8 10 PSQI8.55 Post-intervention   L (9)
Nakamura,et al.45 NSAC Posttraumatic stress disorder with sleep disturbance 35 28 MBB Sleep hygiene education 2 3 MOS-SS57.73 Post-intervention + M (6)
Nakamura,et al.46 NSAC Cancer with insomnia 19 18 MBB Sleep hygiene education 3 6 MOS-SS56.52 Post-intervention +   M (8)
Nakamura,et al.47 NSAC Gulf war illnesswith sleep disturbance 33 27 MBB Sleep hygiene education 3 6 MOS-SS64.2 Post-intervention L (9)
Oken,et al.48 NSAC Dementia caregivers 10 11 MM+CBT-I Caregiver education 6 9 PSQI8.33 Post-intervention Ø M (8)
Van Gordon,et al.49 NSAC Fibromyalgia syndrome 74 74 MAT Cognitive behavioral theory-group 8 18 PSQI14.10 Post-intervention6-month + + L (9)
a

Meditation hours were reported as expected in-class hours per intervention, including the retreat.

b

The v0 sleep scale mean (e.g., baseline weighted average) was used to determine that the study cohort had clinically relevant sleep disturbance based on established cutoff scores.

c

Direction of effect is based on the relative difference in change analysis.

d

Follow-up findings were reported for studies with a follow-up assessment between 5 and 12 months.

e

Inability to obtain the Dykens, et al.,40 follow-up data precluded inclusion in the meta-analysis.

CBT-I, cognitive behavioral therapy-insomnia; ISI, insomnia severity index; MAPs, meditation awareness practices; MAT, meditation awareness training; MBB, mind-body bridging; MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBCT-I, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for insomnia; MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; MM, mindfulness meditation; MOS-SS, medical outcomes study-sleep scale; NR, mediation was encouraged, but no specific time was reported; NSAC, nonspecific active control; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; RCTS, randomized controlled trials; SAC, specific active control; h, high risk of bias; m, medium risk of bias; l, low risk of bias; +, favors meditation (>5%) and is statistically significant; –, favors control (<−5%) and is statistically significant; , favors meditation (>5%) and is not statistically significant; ↓, favors control (<−5%) and is not statistically significant; ø, no effect (within –5% to 5%).