Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;6:156. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00156

Table 3.

Results of the selected best fit, mixed-effect logistic regression model (Model 8; see Table S1) for Experiment One.

Parameter Odds Ratio Lower Bound Upper bound p-values
Intercept (Infection Risk @ 5%, Linguistic Message, Diagnosis Certainty @ 70) 3.337 1.811 6.149 <0.001
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 0.206 0.132 0.321 <0.001
Psychological Distance 0.516 0.345 0.774 0.001
Numeric Message 0.448 0.291 0.690 <0.001
Infection Risk @ 15% 4.342 2.662 7.083 <0.001
Infection Risk @ 25% 5.223 3.168 8.612 <0.001
Order of Play 1.009 0.994 1.025 0.231
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 by Numeric Message 1.451 0.775 2.716 0.245
Numeric Message by Infection Risk @ 15% 0.565 0.294 1.084 0.086
Numeric Message by Infection Risk @ 25% 0.868 0.446 1.692 0.678
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 by Infection Risk @ 15% 8.152 3.937 16.883 <0.001
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 by Infection Risk @ 25% 25.046 10.259 61.143 <0.001
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 by Numeric Message by Infection Risk @ 15% 0.332 0.128 0.861 0.023
Diagnosis Certainty @ 100 by Numeric Message by Infection Risk @ 25% 0.451 0.147 1.389 0.166

Depicted here are the odds ratios for the fixed effects describing relationships with the binary response variable: compliance with the biosecurity protocol. Bold values indicate significance at alpha = 0.05.