Table 8.
Exclusive specificity analysis – triangulation group vs. no triangulation group.
| Triangulation |
No triangulation |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lemma | Occurrence | Lemma | Occurrence |
| Father in law | 14 | Error | 24 |
| Little boy | 12 | Brother | 20 |
| Shoe | 10 | To pay | 20 |
| Eighteen | 7 | To introduce | 17 |
| Borders | 6 | Place | 13 |
| Reconnect | 6 | Expectation | 12 |
| Constitute | 5 | Panic attacks | 12 |
| Distraction | 5 | Staff | 12 |
| Cannabis | 4 | To disappear | 12 |
| Setting up | 4 | Approach | 11 |
| Maturity | 4 | Position | 11 |
| At the same time | 4 | Space | 11 |
| Neuroscience | 4 | Confusion | 10 |
| nutritionist | 4 | Trust | 10 |
| potere_AMB | 4 | Return | 10 |
| Shame | 4 | Sorry | 10 |
| Excuse | 10 | ||
| Money | 10 | ||
| Anxious | 9 | ||
| Elaborate on | 9 | ||