Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;10:1161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01161

Table 8.

Fay and Wu's test was significant in the majority of the study populations.

GKW GND GRC KIV KRC BrJAP CTBA
2n 92 96 102 100 102 116 98
Gene segment Test
IGHG1 Tajima's D
Fu and Li's D
Fu and Li's F
Fay and Wu's H −2.455* −3.400** −3.384** −3.490** −2.36*
IGHG2 Tajima's D −1.680*** −1.716***
Fu and Li's D −2.696**
Fu and Li's F −2.793**
Fay and Wu's H −1.768** −2.745* −4.971** −5.241*** −5.518***
IGHG3 Tajima's D −1.825***
Fu and Li's D −3.615**
Fu and Li's F −3.309**
Fay and Wu's H −4.310** −7.253*** −5.670*** −6.307* −7.372**

Statistical significance was tested by coalescent simulations with 10,000 repetitions:

*

p < 0.01−0.05;

**

p < 0.001−0.01;

***

p < 0.001;

–p>0.05. KIV, Kaingang from Ivaí; KRC, Kaingang from Rio das Cobras; GRC, Guarani Mbya; GKW, Guarani Kaiowa; GND, Guarani Ñandeva; BrJAP, Japanese-descendants; CTBA, Euro-descendants from Curitiba.