Table 6.

Summary and comparisons between Models 1b, 2b and 3b predicting language grammar.

	β	t	p	R2	AIC	F	p	Model comparisons
Model 1b				0.19	205.64	7.71	<0.01
Melody	0.43	2.77	<0.01
Model 2b				0.56	188.42	13.04	<0.001
Melody	0.28	2.32	<0.05
NVA	0.38	2.97	<0.01
VM	0.35	2.71	<0.05
								Model 2b vs. Model 3b
Model 3b				0.48	196.77	15.26	<0.001	F(1,32) = 5.38, p < 0.05
NVA	0.39	2.92	<0.01
VM	0.44	3.26	<0.01

Melody, Melody Perception; NVA, Non-Verbal Ability; VM, Verbal Memory.