Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;10(6):1461–1468. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13095

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics between 40 mg and 30 mg afatinib groups

Characteristics All patients 40 mg 30 mg P
N 60 41 19
Age
Median (years) 58.1 57.2 58.1
Range 36.3–82.7 36.3–70.9 44.6–82.7
Age distribution, N (%)
≥ 65 13 (21.7%) 6 (14.6%) 7 (36.8%) 0.108
< 65 47 (78.3%) 35 (85.4%) 12 (63.2%)
Gender
Male 30 (50.0%) 21 (51.2%) 9 (47.4%) 0.781
Female 30 (50.0%) 20 (48.8%) 10 (52.6%)
Smoking history
Yes 18 (30.0%) 13 (31.7%) 5 (26.3%) 0.672
No 42 (70.0%) 28 (68.3%) 14 (73.7%)
ECOG PS score
0–1 60 (100%) 41 (100%) 41 (100%)
2–4 0 0 0
EGFR mutation
Exon 19 deletion 26 (43.3%) 20 (48.8%) 6 (31.6%) 0.370
Exon 21 L858R 16 (26.7%) 9 (22.0%) 7 (36.8%)
Uncommon mutations 18 (30.0%) 12 (29.3%) 6 (31.6%)
Baseline brain metastasis
Yes 24 (40.0%) 18 (43.9%) 6 (31.6%) 0.365
No 36 (60.0%) 23 (56.1%) 13 (68.4%)
Line of afatinib
First line 39 (65.0%) 29 (70.7%) 10 (52.6%) 0.172
≥ Second line 21 (35.0%) 12 (29.3%) 9 (47.4%)

Four patients had both exon 21 L858R and uncommon mutations and one patient had both exon 19 deletion and uncommon mutations. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.