Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;2019:8905615. doi: 10.1155/2019/8905615

Table 2.

Dilation characteristics and measures of success.

Patient Size of stenosis at time of the first dilation (diameter in mm) Max luminal diameter achieved by study end (mm)∗∗ Time from TL to the first dilation (weeks) Time from TL at study end (weeks) Number of dilations at study end Average time interval between dilations (weeks) Retrograde approach used? Lumen patency string in place (weeks) Use of fluoroscopy Diet/GT score∗∗∗: start of the study period Diet/GT score: end of the study period Technical success? Clinical success?
#1 5 10 32 40 12 3.9 Yes 10 No 2 2 Yes No
#2 2 6 36 85 14 3.8 Yes 39 Yes 2 3 Yes No
#3 2 6 255 338 15 6 Yes n/a Yes 2 3 Yes No
#4 3 6 53 102 12 4.5 Yes 10 Yes 2 3 Yes No
#5 10 12 95 212 10 13 No n/a No 4∗∗∗∗ 5 Yes Yes
#6 0 (CLO) 11 58 237 48 3.5 Yes 45 Yes 1 5 No No
#7 8 9 661 709 7 8.5 No n/a No 4∗∗∗∗ 5 Yes Yes

Complete lumen occlusion. ∗∗Max luminal caliber achieved prior to dilation during the study period. ∗∗∗Diet/GT scale: Score 1 = GT present and NPO, Score 2 = GT present and liquid/pureed diet, Score 3 = GT present and soft/regular diet, Score 4 = no GT and liquid/pureed diet, and Score 5 = no GT and soft/regular diet. ∗∗∗∗GT recommended but patient refused.