Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 10;19:192. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1568-0

Table 3.

Summary of students’ responses using categories described in Table 2

Code n i ni/N Agei Fi/ni
HEL 78 .59 20.7 .64
JOB 44 .33 22.9 .48
ROL 31 .23 21.6 .68
SCH 27 .20 23.0 .59
TOP 27 .20 21.1 .78
VOC 25 .19 22.4 .72
EXP 23 .17 21.2 .70
MIR 21 .16 21.3 .71
HUM 19 .14 19.7 .68
USE 18 .14 20.4 .78
FAM 11 .08 21.7 .55
PRA 10 .08 19.7 .70
REC 9 .07 23.1 .56
TAR 9 .07 20.6 .78
GRA 9 .07 20.6 .67
SMI 7 .05 19.3 1.0
CUR 4 .03 24.5 .25
MIS 3 .02 20.7 .67

In columns: ni, absolute frequency of each category; ni/N (N=133 sample size), relative frequency of each category; Agei, mean age for each category, 21.7 (SD =4.3) mean (SD) age of sample; Fi/ni, females for category (females in the sample 63%).