Figure 7.
Quantitative registration quality control using a slice-wise comparison of NT = 40 imaging data grouped in four sets with three metrics [L2-Norm, Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Cross-Correlation (CrC)] between AIDAmri IA and two observers I01 and I02. The different properties of each data sets are listed in Table 2 and one example slice is shown above each evaluation. Whereas, the ground-truth was determined with the error range of I01/I02, the average error between the automated approach of AIDAmri and the observer-dependent approach IA/I01 and IA/I02 showed no significant differences in all three metrices.