Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 11;14(6):e0218247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218247

Table 1. Participant characteristics per study component, reflecting total numbers and respective proportions (%), except for age, for which mean±SD or age range are reported.

Questionnaire
(N = 97)
FGs
(N = 16)
Doers research
(N = 16)
Mean age (±SD)a 54.6 (8.5) 53.2 (8.8)
Age rangeb
40-<55 years 8 (50)
55-<65 years 8 (50)
Gender N (%)c
Male 37 (38) 7 (44) 8 (50)
Female 60 (62) 9 (56) 8 (50)
Ethnicity N (%)c,d
Chinese 87 (90) 15 (94) 13 (81)
Malay 5 (5) 0 (0) 2 (13)
Indian 2 (2) 1 (6) 0 (0)
Other 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Marital status N (%)c Not assessed
Never married 8 (8)
Currently married 80 (83)
Separated/widowed/divorced 9 (9)
Education N (%)c
No formal/PSLE/less than secondary education 39 (40)
Secondary/O/N/ITE/NTC 43 (44)
Post-secondary education/A’level/Poly/Other diploma 12 (12)
University degree and above 3 (3)
Employment status N (%)c
Employed 61 (63)
Unemployed 22 (23)
Retired 12 (12)
Other 2 (2)

ITE: Institute of Technical Education, NTC: National technical certificate, O/N: O and N levels

Poly: Polytechnic, PSLE: Primary school leaving exam, 12 years old

a For one FG participant, age was not noted

b Participants were purposefully sampled in various age categories

c Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

d For one participant, ethnicity was not reported by the interviewer after the interview.