Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;918:313–360. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-0890-4_12

Table 3.

Evaluation of Salmonella vaccine strains expressing antigen(s) of Y. pestis

Strain Genotype Antigen(s) Immunization route Protective efficacy Reference
S. Typhimurium
SL3261 aroA F1 i.v. or oral i.v. immunization provides complete protection/oral immunization provides 90% protection against 50 LD50s of Y. pestis GB strain s.c. challenge [289]
SL3261 aroA F1/V fusion i.v. provides 85% protection against 50 LD50s of Y. pestis GB strain s.c. challenge [170]
SL3261 aroA F1 expressed under different promoters oral ND (serum antibody responses to F1 reported) [290]
SL3261 aroA LcrV oral provides 30% protection against 97 LD50s of Y. pestis GB strain s.c. challenge [171]
SL3261
SLDAPD
aroA F1 oral oral immunization provides complete protection against 8.8 × 104 LD50s of Y. pestis GB strain s.c. challenge [291]
H683 asd aroA F1 and/or LcrV oral 90% protection against ~1000LD50 Y. pestis 195/P s.c. challenge and 90% protection against ~100LD50 Y. pestis Madagascar [119]
χ8501 hisG Δcrp-28 ΔasdA16 F1 or LcrV i.n. or oral 3 doses of strain synthesizing F1 or LcrV provided 80% or 60% protection against 2×103 CFU of Y. pestis (Yokohama-R strain) i.p. challenge, respectively [292]
χ8501 hisG Δcrp-28 ΔasdA16 Truncated LcrV (aa131-aa327) and Psn oral Truncated LcrV and Psn immunization provide 80% protection against 3000 CFU of Y. pestis CO92 and 75% protection against 1300 CFU of Y. pestis CO92 by s.c. challenge [174]
χ9447 Complex genotypea
Strain displays “regulated in vivo lysis”
LcrV196 on “runaway-like replication plasmid” oral Oral immunization provides 87.5% survival post-s.c. challenge with 4.49 ×102 CFU or 5.63×103 CFU of Y. pestis CO92. Oral immunization shows great efficacy with 75% and 50% survival post-i.n. challenge with 4.1×103 CFU or 4.4×104 CFU of Y. pestis CO92, respectively. [293]
χ9558 Complex genotypeb PsaA oral No protection against s.c. challenge with 4.49 ×102 CFU of Y. pestis CO92 and 25% protection against i.n. challenge with 4.1×103 CFU of Y. pestis CO92 [184]
χ8501 hisG Δcrp-28 ΔasdA16 Psn, HmuR, LcrV196
LcrV5214
oral Immunization with the strain expressing Psn or LcrV196 afforded nearly full protection against s.c challenge and partial protection against i.n. challenge. While immunization with the strain expressing LcrV5214 or HmuR no protection against s.c. or i.n challenge. [175]
χ9558 Complex genotypeb
S. Typhi
BRD1116 aroA aroC htrA F1 i.n. intranasal immunization provides 65% protection against 113 CFU of Y. pestis GB strain s.c. challenge [176]
ACAM948CVD
(CVD 9080)
htrA, aroC, aroD F1 i.n. ~80% protection against i.v. challenge with 10,000 CFU of Y. pestis EV76 in 0.2 ml of sterile PBS. FeCl2 (40 μg/mouse) was administered i.p. immediately. [177]
CVD 910FV guaBA and htrA F1, LcrV i.n. mice receiving the optimized bivalent vaccine were fully protected against lethal pulmonary challenge [294]

Note: Y. pestis GB, LD50 (s.c.) = 1CFU [285]; Y. pestis 195/P, LD50 (s.c.) = 1CFU [295]; Y. pestis Madagascar, LD50 (i.n.) ~100 CFU [295]; Y. pestis (Yokohama-R strain), LD50 (i.p.) = 15 CFU [296]; Y. pestis EV76, LD50 (i.v.) =56 CFU [177]; Y. pestis CO92, LD50 (s.c.) =1.9 CFU, LD50 (i.n.) ~250 CFU, LD50 (aerosol) ~2100 CFU [65, 287, 288];

CFU: Colony forming units; LD50: 50% lethal dose; s.c.: Subcutaneous; i.n.: Intranasal; i.v. Intravenous; i.p.: Intraperitoneal; ND: no detected.

a

Δpmi-2426 Δ(gmd-fcl)-26 ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp ΔasdA21::TT araC PBAD c2 ΔaraE25 ΔaraBAD23 ΔrelA198::araC PBAD lacI TT ΔPmurA7::TT araC PBAD murA ΔendA2311

b

Δpmi-2426 Δ(gmd-fcl)-26 ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp ΔasdA27::TT araC PBAD c2 ΔaraE25 ΔaraBAD23 ΔrelA198::araC PBAD lacI TT ΔsopB1925 ΔagfBAC811