Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;28(4):276–283. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007957

Table 2.

Frequency of major and minor flow disruptions by their type, location, number and role of staff involved

Major disruptions (out of 100%) Minor disruptions (out of 100%)
Layout Environmental hazard Interruptions Usability/
equipment
failure
Total Layout Environmental hazard Interruptions Usability/
equipment
failure
Total
56 10 30 4 100 69 29 1 1 100
Flow disruption location
 Anaesthesia workstation zone 21 3 7 1 32.1 23.6 12.2 1 0 36.8
 Transitional zone 1 zone 4 1.1 2.2 0 7.4 4.4 2 0.1 1 7.6
 Transitional zone 2 zone 6 0.2 4.5 0.2 10.8 10.2 1.6 0.1 0 11.8
 Transitional zone 3 zone 7 1.3 0.8 0.5 9.6 10.9 3.7 0.1 0.1 14.7
 Surgical table 1 zone 7 1.4 4.8 1 14.2 4.2 4 0.3 0.1 8.6
 Surgical table 2 zone 7.2 2 3.7 1.8 14.6 2.5 1.9 0 0.1 4.6
 Support zones 2.4 0 2.4 0.5 5.3 4.3 1.1 1 0 6.4
 Supply zones 2 0.3 1 0 3.3 5.8 1.2 1 0 8
 Other 0.5 0 1.3 1 2.8 0.8 0.3 0.4 0 1.6
Number of staff involved in flow disruption
 1 48 8.7 22 3.2 81.9 49.6 27.7 0.3 0.5 78.1
 >1 7.9 0.9 7 2.3 18.1 19.4 1 1.4 0.1 21.9
Role of staff involved in flow disruption
 Anaesthesiologist/student/resident 22.7 3 7.6 1.6 34.9 32 12.2 0.3 0.2 44.8
 RN, circulating 12.1 2.8 11.2 1.8 27.9 14.9 4.4 0.8 0.1 20.3
 MD, surgeon/student/resident 7.7 1.7 1.7 0.9 12 10.2 2.8 0.5 0.1 13.6
 RN, scrub/surgical tech/student 5.7 0.6 3.8 1.1 11.2 6.4 3.8 0.3 0 10.5
 Other 4.5 1.5 7 1.1 14 7.7 2.6 0.5 0.1 10.9

MD, medical doctor; RN, registered nurse.