Table 1.
Common issues with selected composite indicators of care quality
| CMS Overall Hospital Star Rating | AHRQ PSI90 | Leapfrog Composite Patient Safety Score | MyNHS Overall Stroke Care Rating | NHS England Overall Patient Experience Score | ||
| Transparency | Are all important m ethodological details easily accessible in a public document? |
Yes, but spread across several documents and web pages | Yes, but spread across several documents | Yes | No, searches of MyNHS and SSNAP websites did not find a comprehensive methods | Yes |
| Selection of individual measures | Are the measures used equally applicable across all rated hospitals? | No, some hospitals do not report all measures | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Underlying measures and data | Is missing measure information handled in a way that can introduce bias? | Yes, pairwise deletion is used | Yes, effectively using mean imputation | Yes, pairwise deletion is used where proxy measures are not available | Yes, pairwise deletion is used | No missing measure information |
| Are component measures adequately adjusted for case-mix? | Some but not all measures | Yes | Yes | Not discussed in identified methods | Yes | |
| Use of banding onto consistent scales | Are measures standardised using banding? | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Choice of weights | Is there an apparent justification for the weights used? | Yes, but reason for the precise weights used is unclear | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Is any sensitivity analysis of the choice of weights reported? | No | Yes | No | No | No | |
| Uncertainty | Is the uncertainty in the final composite rating presented? | Not in the star rating | Yes | No | No | Yes |