Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 12;28(4):338–344. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007798

Table 1.

Common issues with selected composite indicators of care quality

CMS Overall Hospital Star Rating AHRQ PSI90 Leapfrog Composite Patient Safety Score MyNHS Overall Stroke Care Rating NHS England Overall Patient Experience Score
Transparency Are all important m
ethodological details easily accessible in a public document?
Yes, but spread across several documents and web pages Yes, but spread across several documents Yes No, searches of MyNHS and SSNAP websites did not find a comprehensive methods Yes
Selection of individual measures Are the measures used equally applicable across all rated hospitals? No, some hospitals do not report all measures Yes Yes Yes Yes
Underlying measures and data Is missing measure information handled in a way that can introduce bias? Yes, pairwise deletion is used Yes, effectively using mean imputation Yes, pairwise deletion is used where proxy measures are not available Yes, pairwise deletion is used No missing measure information
Are component measures adequately adjusted for case-mix? Some but not all measures Yes Yes Not discussed in identified methods Yes
Use of banding onto consistent scales Are measures standardised using banding? No No No Yes No
Choice of weights Is there an apparent justification for the weights used? Yes, but reason for the precise weights used is unclear Yes Yes No No
Is any sensitivity analysis of the choice of weights reported? No Yes No No No
Uncertainty Is the uncertainty in the final composite rating presented? Not in the star rating Yes No No Yes