Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lifetime Data Anal. 2018 Dec 17;25(3):546–568. doi: 10.1007/s10985-018-09459-5

Table 3.

Type-I error for testing βg = 0 at various α levels under correctly specified model scenarios. Four different models were compared: independent Cox (Cox-I), Cox with robust variance estimates (Cox-R), copula with parametric margins (Cop-PM) and coupla with piecewise constant hazards margins (Cop-PW). Number of replication = 100,000, sample size = 500.

Kendall’s τ = 0.2 Kendall’s τ = 0.6
MAF Tail (α) Cox-I Cox-R Cop-PM Cop-PW Cox-I Cox-R Cop-PM Cop-PW
True model: Clayton-Weibull
5% 0.05 0.084 0.062 0.052 0.044 0.141 0.063 0.053 0.046
0.01 0.022 0.016 0.011 0.009 0.053 0.017 0.012 0.009
0.001 0.0034 0.0029 0.0012 0.0009 0.0129 0.0030 0.0014 0.0010
0.0001 0.0007 0.0007 0.0001 0.0001 0.0035 0.0007 0.0002 0.0002
40% 0.05 0.086 0.054 0.052 0.045 0.142 0.055 0.053 0.046
0.01 0.023 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.054 0.012 0.011 0.009
0.001 0.0040 0.0015 0.0013 0.0008 0.0132 0.0014 0.0012 0.0009
0.0001 0.0007 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0033 0.0001 0.0001 0.00004
True model: Clayton-Gompertz
5% 0.05 0.083 0.061 0.053 0.044 0.138 0.062 0.053 0.044
0.01 0.022 0.016 0.011 0.008 0.051 0.016 0.011 0.009
0.001 0.0034 0.0029 0.0012 0.0009 0.0129 0.0030 0.0014 0.0010
0.0001 0.0006 0.0006 0.0002 0.0001 0.0032 0.0007 0.0002 0.0001
40% 0.05 0.084 0.054 0.052 0.044 0.140 0.054 0.052 0.044
0.01 0.023 0.012 0.011 0.008 0.053 0.012 0.011 0.008
0.001 0.0040 0.0015 0.0013 0.0008 0.0132 0.0014 0.0012 0.0009
0.0001 0.0007 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0036 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001