Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar;125(3):1206–1215. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.3.1206

Table II.

Percentage of sequence identity between the different subfamily members

Name TIPs PIPs NIPs SIPs
%
TIPs 36–94
PIPs 25–35 64–100
NIPs 23–34 21–28 39–91
SIPs 17–28 16–24 16–21 30–78