Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 19;20(6):134–140. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12590

Table 2.

Acquisition parameters for 2D image performance comparisons between the 2D (IC5‐9‐D) and 3D (RIC5‐9‐D)

Performance Scanner control IC5‐9‐D RIC5‐9‐D
Depth of penetration Transmit frequency (Harmonic) 7/8 MHz 7/8 MHz
Dynamic range 72 dB 69 dB
Gain 37/37 24/24
Contrast response Transmit frequency (Harmonic) 7/8 MHz 7/8 MHz
Dynamic range 72 dB 69 dB
Gain 30/35 22/14
Anechoic contrast Transmit frequency (Harmonic) 7/8 MHz 7/8 MHz
Dynamic range 72 dB 69 dB
Gain* 32/35 22/22
Image depth* 5.0 cm 5.0 cm
  Focal zone* 2.5 cm 2.5 cm
Spatial resolution Transmit frequency (Harmonic) 7/8 MHz 7/8 MHz
Dynamic range 72 dB 69 dB
Gain* 22/22 14/14
Image depth* 8.0 cm 8.0 cm
  Focal zone* 4.0 cm 4.0 cm
Spherical lesion SNR Transmit frequency (Harmonic) 8 MHz 8 MHz
Dynamic range 72 dB 69 dB
Gain 23 20
Image depth* 6.0 cm 6.0 cm
  Focal zone* 3.0 cm 3.0 cm

The listed parameters were applied for the survey mode acquisitions. Gain values were adjusted to avoid any pixel value saturation for the corresponding transmit frequency which were separated by a slash (/). Controls of acquisition parameters with an asterisk (*) were optimized for each specific target when assessing performance in detailed characterization mode.