Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):197–203. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12879

TABLE 1:

Peripheral Versus Central Tumors

Characteristic Peripheral (n = 55) Central (n = 15) p

Tumor size (cm) 2.5 ± 1.4 2.5 ± 1.0 0.7
Distance from tumor to diaphragm (mm) 4.6 ± 6.2 41.5 ± 20.4 < 0.001
Displacement distance (mm) 2.5 ± 4.3 0 0.002
Ablation zone size (cm) 4.3 ± 1.2 3.6 ± 0.8 0.05
Length of ablation zone butting capsule (cm) 3.6 ± 1.4 0 < 0.001
Ablation time (min) 6.5 ± 3 5.5 ± 2.5 0.2
Ablation power (W) 75.4 ± 21.7 79.3 ± 19.6 0.1
No. of diaphragmatic hernias 0 0
Diaphragm thickness before ablation (mm) 3.1 ± 1.2 3.0 ± 0.5 0.6
Diaphragm thickness immediately after ablation (mm) 4.0 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 0.5 0.2
Patients with shoulder pain, no. (%) 10 (18) 0 (0) 0.2
Average pain score 2.8 ± 2.1 2.4 ± 1.2 0.4
Initial pain score 3.5 ± 3.0 3.1 ± 2.2 0.6
Local tumor progression, no. (%) 3 (5.5) 0 (0) 1
Imaging follow-up (mo) 11.1 ± 7.9 14.1 ± 8.5 0.1

Note—Except where noted otherwise, data are mean ± SD. Peripheral tumors are those with ablation zone < 5 mm from diaphragm. Peripheral liver tumors include all lesions ablated regardless of artificial ascites. Central tumors are those with ablation zone > 1.5 cm from diaphragm.