Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;14:4187–4209. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S198319

Table 2.

Overview of NP-based CTC detection methods

Nanomaterial Pros Cons References
MNPs/nanoclusters Biocompatibility, magnetic separation, high sensitivity Magnetic aggregation; dependence on binding capacity of MNPs (affinity-based) 42, 109112
Fe-core MNPs High magnetic moments, superparamagnetic Rapid oxidation → protective shells needed 57
Magnetic–optical bifunctional NPs Simultaneous detection and isolation of various tumor-cell types, killing by X-ray-based detection possible Affinity-based 53
Micro-NMR Rapid, highly sensitive biomarker detection, only minimal sample purification necessary Variation in NMR frequency depending on temperature 57
Quantum dots Quantitative detection with high sensitivity, various fluorescence types enable capture of heterogeneous CTCs Toxicity affects viability (no further investigations possible), intermittence under continuous excitation 21, 53
Gold NPs Microsurgical removal/laser-controlled detection and direct ablation of CTCs, postcapture analysis Nonbiodegradability, complicated preparation 21, 53, 113, 114
Graphene/graphene oxides High specificity, multiplex functionalization, label-free detection, high conductivity, no toxicity, easy functionalization Aspecific cellular internalization, hybrid sensors not reproducible yet 21, 53, 92, 115118
Liposomes Biocompatibility, long blood-circulation time Low stability 21, 119, 120
Polymeric nanomaterials Biocompatibility and biodegradability, ease of chemical modification, drug encapsulation/conjugation, improves sensitivity/selectivity of surfaces for CTC detection Low stability 53, 97, 121
Hybrid NPs Recovery of viable cells, can proliferate in vitro Different hybrid NPs for different types of CTCs necessary, all trials still in vitro 100
SWCNTs/MWCNTs High stability, bioactivity, capable of cell capture, high sensitivity, even in whole blood One type of aptamer binds only one specific target 122
Microfabricated filters Label-free, unbiased Sensitivity to size 12, 42
Microfluidic-enabled immunoseparation High efficiency, sensitivity, throughput, automatic, further molecular analysis Relied on microscopy imaging for CTC identification after isolation 12, 36, 42, 65, 123
Herringbone chip Transparent device for better imaging 12, 36, 116
CTC chip High throughput, combination of immunomagnetic sorting with micropost-based enrichment 12, 36, 116, 124
Micro–Hall detector Rapid detection, high contrast against blood cells, detection of multiple biomarkers Limited throughput (about 107 cells) 124, 125
Gilupi nanodetector Large volume analyzed Affinity-based, complex procedure 12, 36

Note: Data from Zhang and King.21

Abbreviations: MNPs, magnetic nanoparticles; CTC, circulating tumor cell; SWCNTs, single-walled carbon nanotubes; MWCNTs, multiwalled CNTs; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; NP, nanoparticle.