Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2019 May 1;124:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.027

Table 2.

Association of sociodemographic characteristics with any past-month drinking, NSDUH 2002–2017

All pregnant women (n=13,488) Does association differ by pregnancy stage?a
Prevalence of drinking among the subgroup
%b (SE)
Odds ratiob
(95% CI)
Wald F(df), p-value

Age 0.82(4), p=0.52
 15–17 13.0 (1.90) 1.53 (1.07, 2.19)
 18–20 8.4 (0.89) 0.91 (0.76, 1.17)
 21–25 9.1 (0.57) Reference
 26–34 9.8 (0.63) 1.09 (0.88, 1.35)
 35–44 11.9 (1.44) 1.37 (0.99, 1.90)

Race 0.14(3), p=0.93
 White 10.8 (0.50) Reference
 Black 11.4 (0.97) 1.07 (0.85, 1.34)
 Hispanic 7.0 (0.91) 0.61 (0.45, 0.82)
 Other 6.6 (1.26) 0.56 (0.36, 0.87)

Education 0.56(2), p=0.57
 < High school 8.0 (0.75) Reference
 High school 8.8 (0.73) 1.13 (0.86, 1.48)
 > High school 10.9 (0.62) 1.44 (1.11, 1.88)

Income 0.09(3), p=0.97
 $0-$19,999 8.8 (0.67) 0.69 (0.52, 0.91)
 $20,000-$49,999 8.8 (0.64) 0.70 (0.52, 0.93)
 $50,000-$74,999 9.9 (0.96) 0.80 (0.60, 1.06)
 ≥$75,000 12.0 (1.02) Reference

Marital status 2.96(2), p=0.06
 Married 8.2 (0.49) Reference
 Previously married 15.1 (1.74) 2.09 (1.52, 2.85)
 Never married 12.3 (0.82) 1.62 (1.30, 2.01)
a

Differential association was indicated by significant interaction between the risk factor and pregnancy stage (early [trimester 1] vs. middle/late [trimesters 2 and 3]) in logistic regression. Since no interaction was significant (all p-values>0.05), results are not shown stratified by pregnancy stage.

b

Adjusted for trimester, age, race/ethnicity, education, income, marital status, and year.