Table 1.
Identification of Split Specimens by Hierarchical Clustering
| population sample | visit 2 | visit 4 | total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no. | name | no. of urine specimens | no. of split pairs | split pairs identified | no. of urine specimens | no. of split pairs | split pairs identified | no. of urine specimens | no. of split pairs | split pairs identified (%) |
| 14 | Aito Town | 259 | 24 | 24 | 259 | 23 | 23 | 565 | 47 | 97.9 |
| 41 | Chicago | 315 | 24 | 23 | 315 | 24 | 23 | 678 | 46 | 95.8 |
| 21 | Guangxi | 278 | 23 | 17 | 278 | 24 | 17 | 603 | 34 | 70.8 |
| all three samples | 852 | 71 | 64 | 852 | 71 | 63 | 1846 | 127 | 88.2 | |