Table 3.
Row | Argument | MTM (″/y) Newark–Hartford | FA (″/y) Newark–Hartford | FA La2010d* residual (″/y) | La2010d* (″/y) | La2010 (″/y) |
0 | g5 | 4.257482† | 4.257482† | 4.257438 | 4.257482 | |
1 | g4 − g3‡ | 0.742 | 0.727‡ | 0.014† | ||
2 | (g1)§ | 5.662 | (5.661)§ | (0.050)§ | (5.611)§ | 5.59 |
3 | g2 − g1‡ | 1.795 | 1.796‡ | 0.006‡ | ||
4 | (g2 − g5) − (g4 − g3)‡ | 2.456 | 2.473 | −0.016‡ | ||
5 | (g2)§ | 7.456 | (7.458)§ | −0.003† | 7.461 | 7.453 |
6 | g3 − g2‡ | 9.783 | 9.788‡ | 0.017‡ | ||
7 | g4 − g2‡ | 10.526 | 10.516‡ | 0.014‡ | ||
8 | (g3)§ | 17.240 | (17.246)§ | (0.010)§ | (17.236)§ | 17.368 |
9 | (g4)§ | 17.982 | (17.973)§ | (0.018)§ | (17.955)§ | 17.916 |
Assumed values; g5 is considered a constant, and g2 is obtained from g2 − g5 to which the data are tuned.
The gi values obtained from the gi − g5 terms as identified in the Newark–Hartford data.
Consistency check values computed with determined gi values compared with the Newark–Hartford value from FA.