Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;36(2):149–154. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.83007

TABLE 3.

Derived performance indicators for winning and losing teams expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), percentage (%) mean difference and effect sizes (ES) with their 90% confidence intervals (CI) and interpretation. P-values were calculated using the likelihood ratio test in the mixed linear model (MLM).

Derived performance indicators Teams
Losing vs. Winning teams
Winning Losing MLM % Mean difference (90% CI) ES (90% CI) Interpretation
Number of ball possessions 31.85 ± 2.61 29.75 ± 4.42 P=0.083 -6.56 (-13. 13; 0.50) -0.77 (-1.61; 0.05) Moderate
Team’s offensive rating 0.56 ± 0.08 0.47 ± 0.06 P=0.015 -16.20 (-25.74; -5.43) -1.22 (-2.06; -0.38) Large
Team’s defensive rating 0.46 ± 0.11 0.62 ± 0.11 P=0.004 36.69 (13.81; 64.17) 1.42 (0.58; 2.25) Large
Effective field goal percentage 0.45 ± 0.08 0.41 ± 0.11 P=0.208 -9.81 (-25.42; 9.05) -0.45 (-1.28; 0.38) Moderate
Offensive rebounding percentage 0.22 ± 0.14 0.38 ± 0.12 P<0.001 59.09 (4.25; 142.76) 0.97 (0.08; 1.87) Moderate
Recovered balls per ball possession 0.34 ± 0.09 0.22 ± 0.11 P=0.005 -40.22 (-57.24; -16.41) -1.28 (-2.12; -0.44) Large
Free throw rate 0.12 ± 0.07 0.07 ± 0.04 P=0.064 -45.68 (-66.62; -11.61) -1.04 (-1.88; -0.21) Moderate