Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;2019(3):hoz010. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz010

Table III.

Reporting quality of methodology of included studies.

Methods Frequency %
Describes the data source
 Yes 16/19 84.2
 Incomplete 2/19 10.5
 Unclear 1/19 5.3
Describes type of records (inpatient, outpatient, linked records)
 Yes 18/19 94.7
 Unclear 1/19 5.3
Describes setting and locations where data were collected
 Yes 18/19 94.7
 Incomplete 1/19 5.3
Reports a priori sample size
 Yes 1/19 5.3
Provides statistical justification for the sample size
 Yes 0/19 0.0
Describe recruitment procedure of validation cohort (from a database, based on diagnostic codes)
 Yes 17/19 89.5
 Unclear 2/19 10.5
Describe patient sampling (Random, consecutive, all)
 Random sampling 1/19 5.3
 All 14/19 73.7
 Unclear 2/19 10.5
 Incomplete 2/19 10.5
Describe how participants were chosen for data collection and analysis
 Yes 15/19 78.9
 Unclear 2/19 10.5
Describes inclusion/exclusion criteria
 Yes 14/19 73.7
 Incomplete 1/19 5.3
Describes who identified patients (for patients identified from medical records)
 Yes 1/19 5.3
 Incomplete 1/19 5.3
Describes who collected data
 Yes 3/19 15.8
Describes use of a priori data collection form
 Yes 13/19 68.4
 Unclear 1/19 5.3
Use of a split sample or an independent sample (revalidation using a separate cohort)
 Yes 1/19 5.3
Describes the reference standard
 Yes 13/17 76.5
Reports the number of persons reading the reference standard
 Yes 2/17 11.8
Describes the training or expertise of persons reading reference standard
 Yes 1/17 5.9
Readers of the reference standard were blinded to the results of the classification by routinely collected data for that patient (reference standard: medical records)
 Yes 1/17 5.9
Reports a measure of concordance if >1 persons reading the reference standard
 Yes 0/17 0.0
Describes the linkage procedure, if done (probabilistic/deterministic)
 Yes 8/15 50.0
 Incomplete 6/15 37.5
Describes the methods of linkage quality evaluation
 Yes 7/15 46.7
 Incomplete 2/15 13.3
Describes explicit methods for calculating or comparing measures of accuracy and statistical methods used to quantify uncertainty
 Yes 13/19 68.4