Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct 6;27(1):97–108. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4

Table 3.

Study Characteristics

Variable Number of studies (%)
Length of peer support contact
  Less than 1 month 20 (20.0)
  Between 1 month and less than 6 months 16(16.0)
  Greater than 6 months 17(17.0)
  Not reported or unclear 47 (47.0)
Study Design
  Randomized Controlled Trial 26 (26.0)
  Cluster-randomized Randomized Controlled Trial 6 (6.0)
  Quasi-experimental 9 (9.0)
  Other controlled triala 2 (2.0)
  Single group pre-post 19(19.0)
  Descriptive or observational 30 (30.0)
  Otherb 4 (4.0)
  Not reported 4 (4.0)
Study Funding
  Federal 37 (37.0)
  Private (state or regional foundation) 4 (4.0)
  Private (national foundation) 12(12.0)
  State / local government 4 (4.0)
  Pharmaceutical 0(0)
  Other 3 (3.0)
  Multiple c 27 (27.0)
  Not reported 13 (13.0)
Study Outcomes
  Recipient engagement in clinical care 43 (43.0)
  Behavioral risk 2 (2.0)
  Quality of life 0(0)
  Mental health 0(0)
  Other psychosocial outcomes d 8 (8.0)
  Cancer progression and other clinical outcomes 0(0)
  Othere 4 (4.0)
  Multiple f 40 (40.0)
  Not reported 3 (43.0)
a

Examples: “Cluster-randomized at clinic level, randomized at individual level” and “group-randomized trial with nested cohort design”

b

Examples: “Simulation” or “multiple types of study designs”

c

The most common type of funding combination was federal and private (n=11, 11% of all studies).

d

Examples: appraisal, self-efficacy, social support, attitudes, optimism, intentions, knowledge)

e

Examples: “cost”, “feasibility or process evaluation outcomes”, “sexual function”, etc.

f

The most common type of combination was recipient engagement in clinical care and psychosocial outcomes (n=16, 16% of all studies).