Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;6(1):e000420. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000420

Table 3.

ECCO2R compared to standard care for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Patient or population: adults with ARDS
Settings: intensive care
Intervention: ECCO2R
Comparison: standard care
Outcomes Relative effect (95% CI) No. of participants (studies) Quality of evidence (GRADE) Comments
Mortality (hospital) No MA conducted 457
(13 studies)
+---
VERY LOW
Due to serious risk of bias, serious inconsistency, serious indirectness and serious imprecision
Mostly observational studies. Only two RCTs performed. No MA performed as variable approach to ECCO2R and standard ventilator strategies. Mortality estimates presented as simple descriptions
27%–75% (mean 55.5%, SD 47.2 to 60.3)
Adverse events No MA conducted 485
(13 studies)
+---
VERY LOW
Due to serious risk of bias, serious inconsistency, serious indirectness and serious imprecision
0%–25% incidence of arterial injury. Higher incidence of transfusion reported in two studies.
Complications presented as aggregated simple descriptions—0%–25%

ECCO2R, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal.