Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;6(1):e000420. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000420

Table 8.

NMBAs compared to placebo for ARDS

Patient or population: adults with ARDS
Settings: intensive care
Intervention: NMBAs, cisatracurium infusion in all studies
Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No. of participants (studies) Quality of evidence (GRADE) Comments
Control risk Intervention risk
Placebo NMBAs
Mortality (ICU) 447 per 1000 313 per 1000
(246 to 398)
RR 0.70
(0.55 to
0.89)
431
(three studies)
+++- MODERATE
Due to serious risk of bias and serious indirectness
All trials studied a 48 hours infusion of cisatracurium besylate
Mortality (28 day) 389 per 1000 257 per 1000
(195 to 339)
RR 0.66
(0.50 to
0.87)
431
(three studies)
+++-
MODERATE
Due to serious risk of bias and serious indirectness
See above
Mortality (hospital) 471 per 1000 339 per 1000
(273 to 429)
RR 0.72
(0.58 to
0.91)
431
(three studies)
+++-
MODERATE
Due to serious risk of bias and serious indirectness
See above truncated at 90 days
Adverse events: ICU acquired weakness 298 per 1000 322 per 1000
(247 to 420)
RR 1.08
(0.83 to
1.41)
431
(three studies)
+---
VERY LOW
Due to very serious risk of bias, serious inconsistency and serious indirectness
Lack of robust screening for weakness in first two RCTs. Third RCT only assessed weakness until ICU discharge. Screening methods differed greatly between RCT

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit; NMBA, neuromuscular blocking agents; RCT, randomised controlled trial.