Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Res Theory. 2018 Sep 28;27(3):242–248. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1498846

Table 3.

Daily Negative Mood as a Moderator of Daily Impulsivity and Daily Alcohol Use Outcomes

Whether drank OR (CI) Number of drinks ERR (CI) Heavy drinking OR (CI) Number of problems ERR (CI) Drinking intentions B (SE)
Level 1
 Intercept 0.60 (0.33-1.11) 1.31 (0.74-2.34) 1.67 (1.44-1.94)*** 1.38 (0.74-2.57) 22.86 (5.46)***
 Day-level impulsivity 0.92 (0.76-1.23) 0.97 (0.86-1.10) 1.10 (1.00-1.21)* 1.14 (0.94-1.40) 1.71 (1.12)
 Day-level positive mood 1.07 (0.99-1.16) 1.02 (0.98-1.07) 0.99 (0.96-1.01) 1.00 (0.95-1.05) 1.01 (0.44)*
 Day-level negative mood 0.90 (0.76-1.06) 0.94 (0.85-1.04) 0.98 (0.92-1.05) 1.00 (0.84-1.18) −1.34 (0.86)
 Day-level impulsivity x day-level negative mood 1.01 (0.94-1.10) 1.01 (0.97-1.06) 0.99 (0.96-1.03) 1.02 (0.93-1.12) 0.16 (0.43)
Level 2
 Aggregate impulsivity 0.96 (0.76-1.23) 0.88 (0.68-1.14) 0.93 (0.86-1.00) 1.04 (0.79-1.36) −0.72 (2.19)

Note. A Bernoulli distribution was used for outcomes of whether individuals drank and whether individuals engaged in heavy drinking (4+/5+ drinks for women/men). A Poisson distribution was used for the outcomes of number of drinks consumed and number of problems reported. A normal distribution was used for the outcome of drinking intentions. OR = Odds Ratio. ERR = Event Rate Ratio. HED = heavy episodic drinking.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .001.